Jump to:
| Project: | Drupal core |
| Version: | 7.x-dev |
| Component: | filter.module |
| Category: | feature request |
| Priority: | minor |
| Assigned: | Unassigned |
| Status: | closed (duplicate) |
Issue Summary
I've searched and searched on this, and currently it only seems possible via hacking/hardcoding, which I do not wish to do. It is fairly intuitive for me. I'm going to use the example of my own experience, as I am not a coder of any note.
1) The ability to only allow (not default to) the bbcode filter for blogs and forums, even for story nodes.
2) Page and bookpage would be pure html
The difference here is that in my community, blog, forum and story nodes are published immediately, or their editors are, to put it lightly, not great with formatting. For the 'website content', which is edited and formatted according to standards I lay down (e.g. structure the document, don't format it.) I want them to have FULL html. The articles go through a workflow, so disallowing bbcode is not really necessary, but preventing my editors from using pure html in forums and other places is essential.
This is not urgent, but I think it would be an obvious feature or configuration to include in future versions, and judging by search I am not alone in my wish for this to happen.
Comments
#1
Features go against development version, not stable.
You might be able to do this with a custom module and some hook_form_alter magic.
#2
I wasn't sure which version was more appropriate, so thanks for moving it. I hope someone does either improve the functionality of the filter.module to supply this, or create another .module that does not require modifications and patching of core files. *prays*
#3
#4
The following module might be a solution in the meantime: http://drupal.org/project/filterbynodetype
#5
Thanks for taking the time to report this issue.
However, marking as duplicate of #238696: The ability to assign the default filter by node type. Please search for existing issues before submitting a new one.
You can follow up on that issue to track its status instead. If any information from this issue is missing in the other issue, please make sure you provide it over there.
#6
I guess the formal answer must be a copy-paste..
just to be correct here: 101037 < 238696