Provide a correct value for the package group.

CommentFileSizeAuthor
taxonomy_html.info.patch636 bytesAnonymous (not verified)

Comments

gábor hojtsy’s picture

gábor hojtsy
he/him
Primary language Hungarian
Location Hungary
commented

Is there a taxonomy package somewhere? The developer instructions say that if a module is not part of a larger package, then that value should be kept emtpy (or not specified at all).

gábor hojtsy’s picture

gábor hojtsy
he/him
Primary language Hungarian
Location Hungary
commented
Status: Needs review » Postponed (maintainer needs more info)
Anonymous’s picture

Anonymous (not verified) commented

You are correct. At the time I submitted the file I didn't understand the intended purpose of package. IMO, Taxonomy should be declared a package because there are several inter-related packages that deal with Taxonomy. The package value groups like things together in the new menuing system. Perhaps a discussion with the developers should be raised? Do you want me to resubmit the file without the package?

gábor hojtsy’s picture

gábor hojtsy
he/him
Primary language Hungarian
Location Hungary
commented
Status: Postponed (maintainer needs more info) » Closed (works as designed)

The definition of what a package is is not clear to say the least. As far as I see, it is not something to use to signify the main purpose of the module, but its relation to a well defined group. In this case, we don't have a well defined group to relate to.

Maybe you care enough to raise this issue on the development mailing list, and start a discussion.

I have already comitted a fix to the info file, and removed the empty package line, so no need to submit a new file, thanks.