Seems doing it via Term ID is the first hurdle. How much work do you think creating another argument class would be for Term ID parallel to views_tpo_handler_taxonomy_term_name.inc class?

Is there perhaps an example somewhere of a Term ID class as a base? That could have the TPO settings and values replaced in?
Am I massively understating the difficulty?

Thanks.

PS: For me it's really all about the depth issue.

Comments

plach’s picture

plach
he/him
Primary language Italian
Location Venezia
commented

Supporting term ids will require a massive refactoring of VTPO code base since I'll need to find a clever way to reuse the code implementing the logic shared by the two handlers. Hence this will be for 6.x-2.x-dev if someone doesn't provide a patch before.

IIRC supporting depth is not possible since the taxonomy API function VTPO is based on takes only a single term argument.

rburgundy’s picture

rburgundy commented
Version: 6.x-1.0-alpha2 » 6.x-1.x-dev
Status: Active » Postponed

+1 subscribing

youkho’s picture

youkho commented

sub