Blatant title :) No idea on the exact steps, but it's going to change.
And in order to not break the existing, and as always and in general, we start with tests. :)
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| skinr-HEAD.configure.0.patch | 5.6 KB | sun |
Blatant title :) No idea on the exact steps, but it's going to change.
And in order to not break the existing, and as always and in general, we start with tests. :)
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| skinr-HEAD.configure.0.patch | 5.6 KB | sun |
Comments
Comment #1
sunComment #2
jacineHAWT! 77 passes, 0 fails, 0 exceptions, and 21 debug messages
Yay! Committed: http://drupal.org/cvs?commit=483076
Comment #3
jacineThis issue doesn't explain anything about what needs to happen, so no one other than you has any idea what should be done here, btw.
Comment #4
sunNote that I don't have a "master plan" either, I only know about the factual and actual problems of the current module design. And those, we need to fix.
Based on our last call, this is about some fundamental changes we need to discuss; e.g.:
We also discussed that skin configurations can be applied to multiple themes currently. Ideally, we leave that to a separate issue, and keep the idea in mind that "cloning" an existing skin configuration for another theme would be the simplest solution.
Comment #5
sun#1044222: Remove skin configuration functionality from third-party forms
Comment #6
moonray commented#1082842: Update storage of skin configurations to give more granular control should take care of the first part of
Comment #7
moonray commentedAnd for 3. #1147936: Decouple having to load skin info when we only need to apply skins.
Comment #8
moonray commentedFor the second part of 2. see #1163676: Allow cloning of exisitng skin configuration to apply to another theme.
Comment #9
moonray commentedComment #10
moonray commentedClosing this issue. The last issue in #8 needs discussing and might not even make it in if not needed.
Comment #11
moonray commented