'content' instead of 'node'' in the UI

Looks like we actually might be able to delete the 'node'. No need to substitute it with 'item'.

I think Dries means that rather than saying "2 page items" or "2 page content" you should just say "2 pages."

However, that doesn't work because the plural for story, for example, is "stories" not "storys." You can say "1 story," but the sentences should probably match.

The word we use for single instances of content though is typically "posts" -- so updated the patch to reflect this.

That issue to me seems more to refer to a menu entry that said "posts" and nothing more. What are posts? What about posts can I do here? etc. The other changes/comments in that thread seem to be related to that change (if we call posts content here, we should do it here and here as well for consistency).

If we're wanting to remove the word "post" entirely from the UI, we have A LOT of work to do, none of which can be done in the timeframe of an RC, especially in a string freeze. "Posts" seems to be the word used throughout core when talking about individual pieces of content, rather than content as a whole -- ex: "My recent posts" in tracker module, "Manage posts by content type" in the admin menu, "Post settings", etc.

"Items" tends to refer to menu or RSS items in the UI, so probably shouldn't be used. "contents" is not a plural word -- it would be content. However, it's awkward to say "there are 2 story content" -- so I would stick with posts.

> "contents" is not a plural word

Heh. ;) Of course "contents" _is_ a plural word; but "content" in the general sense of "the site's content" where it is used most often cannot be pluralized; "contents" means "the stuff inside this thing" and we're talking about individual pieces of "the content" itself.

That is probably still confusing so I think I will drop it now. :)

Agreed. ;)

Committed to HEAD.