Closed (fixed)
Project:
Zipcode (CCK)
Version:
6.x-2.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
26 Feb 2011 at 05:41 UTC
Updated:
3 Jan 2014 at 02:58 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
tedstein commentedSubscribing.
Comment #2
spessex commentedSubscribing
Comment #3
pepperstreet commentedSubscribing
Comment #4
basicmagic.net commentedsubscribe
Comment #5
spgd01 commentedsubcribe
Comment #6
klonos...less vague title & proper tags.
Comment #7
classicridge commentedsubscribing...
Comment #8
liam morlandComment #9
jeremyclassic commentedsubscribing
Comment #10
liam morland"CCK" should be removed from name as part of port. See #157784: Name should just be Phone.
Comment #11
klonosAs I similarly suggested to that issue too, the project's name should be plain "Zipcode", while the 6.x .info file could call it "Zipcode CCK" and the 7.x .info file "Zipcode field" or "Zipcode fields". This would both make sense and at the same time clearly imply/explain why the one requires CCK while the other requires D7 core Field API.
Comment #12
liam morlandActually, the project name should be Postal Code, since that is the common term used world-wide. Zipcode is the American implementation of the postal code. Is there a way to rename a project?
Comment #13
klonosI could only find this.
Comment #14
liam morlandThe link is asking for a login.
Comment #15
klonosIt wasn't when I checked 2 days ago :/
Anyways, here's what I could find (courtesy of Google cache):
...hope this helps.
Comment #16
jfha73 commentedHey guys,
I'm just wondering if somebody is working on get this port done?
I have not seen anything about the port to D7 in this issue and I would like to know.
Thanks.
Comment #17
liam morlandMaintainer here. I am not actively working on this module. I volunteered to be the maintainer because it hurt to see so many good patches waiting in the queue. However, I may need a D7 version within a few months for a project. If so, I will port it.
Comment #18
jfha73 commentedI appreciate that and thanks for the information.
Comment #19
jeremyclassic commentedSince this issue has been up for a year, I hope it's not presumptuous of me to say I've taken the liberty of writing a separate module for d7. Liam, et al: your version is amazing for D6 & CCK.
D7 just needs so many changes, that I'm offering my (sandbox version) as a possible alternative: Postal Code. I'd be very happy for any feedback. Countries available:
Comment #20
liam morlandFantastic! I was planning on renaming the module to postal_code as part of the D7 upgrade. Because of the many changes, I was planning on using the D7 phone module as a model. I also wanted to get more of the country-specific code into the country-specific files.
If you've already got a start, that can be the start of the D7 version. Once the D7 version is working, there should be an upgrade path from zipcode.
Let me know if you need my help.
Comment #21
klonos...this is good news!
I just filed #1564358: Initial release of Postal Code? / Current status / What needs testing ...a.k.a. "Are we there yet?". Should we close this issue here and take it there instead? If so, then perhaps people coming to this project's page deserve to be informed that there will be no D7 port but a complete rewrite instead (with a link to the other project). It would also be nice to let people know that you intent to provide an upgrade path from Zipcode to Postal Code.
Comment #22
liam morlandAgreed.
The Drupal 7 version of this module will be called Postal Code. There is currently a sandbox version of Postal Code. The upgrade is discussed in #1564358: Initial release of Postal Code? / Current status / What needs testing ...a.k.a. "Are we there yet?".
Creating an upgrade path should be part of the process of writing Postal Code. I can't really help with this because I don't have a D6 site so I can't do any testing.