I think the page should preserve the line breaks, it makes for easier reading.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #6 | 0001-Issue-1075702-Fixed-Commits-page-does-not-preserve-l.patch | 1.37 KB | marvil07 |
| #2 | git-commit-log-readability-issue.png | 31.16 KB | icc |
I think the page should preserve the line breaks, it makes for easier reading.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #6 | 0001-Issue-1075702-Fixed-Commits-page-does-not-preserve-l.patch | 1.37 KB | marvil07 |
| #2 | git-commit-log-readability-issue.png | 31.16 KB | icc |
Comments
Comment #1
eliza411 commentedPlease include a link to a specific commit page where the failure to preserve line breaks is causing readability problems. If the example is likely to change over time, a screen cap would be appropriate as well.
Comment #2
icc commentedAttached a screenshot which illustrates the issue.
Comment #3
hass commentedSame issue in piwik commit messages.
Comment #4
eliza411 commented@sarah_p: Is this something you can take a look at?
Comment #5
sdboyer commentedI think this is actually a problem with how we read the data in - we read line by line, and probably destroy intentional newlines in the process. Yuck. Time to give
exec()the boot in favor ofproc_open()...If I'm wrong about this, I'll switch the queues back. For the moment, though, assigning to marvil07.
Comment #6
marvil07 commentedThanks you very much for catching this!
Patch attached ;-)
@sdboyer: definitely we need to revisit this whole git history parser, but for now it do enough IMHO.
Comment #7
marvil07 commented@sdboyer: This seems to be a trivial patch, so a quick review would be fine ;-)
Comment #8
sdboyer commentedwfm. push away
Comment #9
marvil07 commentedOk, it's there.
Comment #10
eliza411 commentedTagging for deployment
Comment #12
eliza411 commentedNot deployed yet, reopening.
Comment #13
drummIt is fine to leave this fixed. It clutters up issue queues to have things that are fixed, but not deployed, hanging around. Is is okay to use -dev or do you want to roll a tagged release?
Comment #14
eliza411 commentedYeah, sorry about that ... I've figured it out a little better since April, but not all the way yet.
Comment #16
marvil07 commentedDeployed today