Closed (works as designed)
Project:
Advanced Forum
Version:
7.x-2.0
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
30 Mar 2011 at 13:31 UTC
Updated:
12 Aug 2012 at 13:03 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
troky commented#1104832: Strict warning: Non-static method views_many_to_one_helper
Install latest Views and CTools.
Please try to use search function before posting duplicate issue.
Comment #2
jemond commentedI ran into this problem using the latest stable releases of this module, Views, and CTools. Changing the Views API version from 3 alpha to just 3 seemed to do the trick. Patch attached.
Comment #3
jemond commentedI've deployed this to my production site, and it seems to have addressed the issue.
Comment #4
jemond commentedThis patch did not in fact fix the issue. I'm debugging this more today and will update shortly.
Comment #5
jemond commentedI was using the latest stable releases of Views and CTools. I have confirmed that updating to the dev snapshots of Views and CTools did not fix this issue. I'm still looking.
Comment #6
jemond commentedAlso, I think this comment in 1104832 no longer applies as it appears that the 'file' key is no longer supported.
Comment #7
jemond commentedWell, after much more troubleshooting the patch may indeed be the fix. I didn't properly flush Redis on my production machine, so that may have explained why the issue persisted. I'm going to leave the patch on production for a few days to see if the issue is truly fixed and will update back here.
Comment #8
jemond commentedComment #9
jemond commentedThe patch didn't work. I'm totally stumped.
Comment #10
jemond commentedCross-posted to StackExchange with no luck: http://drupal.stackexchange.com/questions/38231/what-is-causing-views-to...
Comment #11
troky commentedAccording to your post(s) at StackExchange it looks like problem is in Views caching mechanism.
#853864: views_get_default_view() - race conditions and memory usage
#1102252: Caching of defaults
Comment #12
jemond commentedYes, looking that way.