Not sure if this is the right spot to request. I understand that the ability to promote projects has been split from ridiculous super powers no mortal should have. Despite that, i'll apply for project-promotion power anyway ;-)

I am fully attuned to the fact that the Git migration has made the approval process much less critical for people to be contributing and collaborating, but people seeking to maintain a full project need to know their offer is being taken seriously. If they aren't showing evidence of being serious yet themselves, i'll have no problem saying try again later.

What i intend to do is link from the Peer Review group to the project applications queue and ask reviewers to look at the project expectations and coding-standards pages. (I'd appreciate someone giving me the contents of the old CVS Application Guidelines - http://drupal.org/node/59 - because if i remember correctly it was a pretty awesome code review process.) Not every review will be sufficient, i'm sure, but applicants will start to get more immediate feedback.

I will not promote any project to a full project that has not been reviewed by someone other than me, but i won't necessarily let any objection from additional reviewers put a hold on it either.

Thank you.

benjamin, agaric

Comments

arianek’s picture

subs

catch’s picture

+1 from me, this is a horrible bottleneck and Ben is great.

michelle’s picture

+1 from me. Glad to see others taking up the cause. :)

Michelle

MGParisi’s picture

Open it up

Anything else will kill drupal.

Licensee - Check
Readme - Check
Version - check

Promote page - check

Ill do that for the 500 current projects waiting approval

http://groups.drupal.org/node/139754

arianek’s picture

ps. by "subs" i also meant +1 total vote of confidence in benjamin being a great person for this.

catch’s picture

Project: Drupal.org infrastructure » Drupal.org site moderators
Component: Git » User account
Status: Active » Reviewed & tested by the community

That's enough people. I don't have administer users permission on Drupal.org any more to flip the switch. Also I think this belongs in webmasters.

chx’s picture

Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Fixed
chx’s picture

I have granted the "Git administrator" role to Ben.

mlncn’s picture

Actually if someone could tell me how to use this permission that'd be great ;-)

catch’s picture

Status: Fixed » Reviewed & tested by the community

It looks like this permission requires 'administer users' in order to be able to actually use it. Moving back to RTBC.

avpaderno’s picture

The permission to administer users is required, or the user will not see the tab to make a user a vetted user, which is under user/<uid>/edit.
It is still possible to access that tab, but the user should manually write the link.

killes@www.drop.org’s picture

mlncn is now a user admin too

michelle’s picture

Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Fixed

Sound like this is fixed, then. :)

Michelle

zzolo’s picture

Please note that the user administration privilege is not needed. You can simply type in the URL manually: http://drupal.org/user//edit/git

See: #1076332: "Git adminstrator" role does not have enough permissions to do their job

There is currently no documentation on being a Git Administrator. This should happen (hopefully I will have time for this).

mlncn’s picture

Thank you all! I did figure out that shortcut. zzolo, do you know where the Git Administrator documentation should live? i can at least start it. Thanks.

zzolo’s picture

I would suggest somewhere under this page: http://drupal.org/node/636570

kbell’s picture

+1 from me too!

This bottleneck is driving away so much potential energy in the community, and at the worst possible time - right after the D7 launch and DCChicago, when there is a lot of great new energy pumping into the Community from newly-engaged developers, and we're just throwing it away. BIG thank yous to Ben et al for not letting this issue die.

-Kelly (kbell)

greggles’s picture

Hi Kelly,

The best way to move the process along is...to move the process along. I notice you've never commented in the projectapplications queue. Perhaps you'd like to read up on the process and then dive in

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.