Closed (outdated)
Project:
Facebook Like Button
Version:
7.x-2.0
Component:
Miscellaneous
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Reporter:
Created:
8 Apr 2011 at 18:55 UTC
Updated:
11 Nov 2024 at 13:03 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
codevoice commentedOr put another way, I'd like to add some ability for users to override the general settings via CCK or something... a checkbox that says "Don't include the Like button on this page" would be nice.
Anyway, subscribe.
Comment #2
danihobbs commentedThirded. Subscribe.
Comment #3
xaa commentedsubscribe
thanks for this module.
Comment #4
cata.vancea commentedsubscribe
Comment #5
jerdiggity commentedGood call... I'll work on that for the next release. (And by the way, any patches are welcome.) ;)
Comment #6
torotil commentedIt seems that this could be easily achieved in D7 by integrating with the Field API via hook_field_extra_fields() this would also make it possible to position the button freely inside the node content.
Comment #7
summit commentedHi,
Would love to see the like button on term-pages and other custom panel pages. May be possible to use tokens to set the pages on which the like button should show?
Greetings, Martijn
Comment #8
dmsmidtToday I released a new version, which allow you to display the like button in your own block in stead of the content area.
This will give you the possibility to hide or view the block via the block settings.
I know this is not quite what we want (that is views integration, panels, termspages etc.), but can maybe help some in current needs..
Comment #9
thomas1977 commentedStill not possible to have the like button working on specific pages? Node types (dynamic) and homepage (static) is not quite enough in many use cases... Or maybe I'm missing something?
Thanks for the module anyway!
Best,
Thomas
Comment #10
gvsoMaybe you can create a specific content type with similar settings to the "Basic Page" content type and assigned fblikebutton to work on it. It would be a little annoying, but it might work as expected.
Comment #11
astonvictor commentedI'm closing it because the issue was created a long time ago without any further steps.
if you still need it then raise a new one.
thanks