I've got 4.5.0RC installed, using the Chameleon pure theme (but I've tried it using Bluemarine and get the same result). I've just configured the first vocabulary (non-hierarchical, only three terms). I want to set a menu (in secondary terms) to display these three terms along with their description.

My first problem is that "taxonomy/page/and/1,2,3" (as in manual) has disappeared, however after some messing about I discover that there is something called "taxonomy/term" which would seem to do the trick. Trouble is,
- when I put in "taxonomy/term/1", I just get the title and description of the first term
- when I put in "taxonomy/term/1,2,3", I get the titles of the first three terms separated by commas (and with no links associated), the description of term 1, and the message that "there are no posts in this category" (only term 1 has posts so far);
- when I put in "taxonomy/term/or/1,2,3", I get what I want, except that just above the first term's title is the message "page not found".

Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? I had this working under 4.4.0 using Gsworks, but I want to switch to a standard theme.

Thanks - JG

Comments

joel_guesclin’s picture

First of all, sorry about the three copies of the same, my ADSL was mucking up and I didn't realise I had already posted.

Another point: under the "Page not found" is a link to "administer" which allows me to create a new term that is not linked to any vocabulary at all. Help!!

Steven’s picture

From the taxonomy module help:

Displaying content organized by terms

In order to view the content associated with a term or a collection of terms, you should browse to a properly formed Taxonomy URL. For example, taxonomy/term/1+2. Taxonomy URLs always contain one or more term IDs at the end of the URL. You may learn the term ID for a given term by hovering over that term in the taxonomy overview page and noting the number at the end or the URL. To build a Taxonomy URL start with "taxonomy/term/". Then list the term IDs, separated by "+" to choose content tagged with any of the given term IDs, or separated by "," to choose content tagged with all of the given term IDs. In other words, "+" is less specific than ",". Finally, you may optionally specify a "depth" in the vocabulary hierarchy. This defaults to "0", which means only the explicitly listed terms are searched. A positive number indicates the number of additional levels of the tree to search. You may also use the value "all", which means that all descendant terms are searched.

joel_guesclin’s picture

I think I got confused - none of this worked without taxonomy_context. Now I have gone back and reinstalled from scratch using taxonomy_context, and I almost get what I want, except for a display problem which I have detailed here