Closed (fixed)
Project:
Event
Version:
5.x-2.x-dev
Component:
Basic Event
Priority:
Critical
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
10 Feb 2007 at 17:08 UTC
Updated:
28 Feb 2007 at 16:47 UTC
I used event and event_views module on my 4.7 site, on views admin page, there are event_select, event_js, event_date and event_calendar etc. default pages.
But I found the event_calendar seems missing at HEAD version of event.module while I update my site to 5.0. I am wording that anybody else got this problem or just me?
Due to I need the event_calendar views page to create different calendars of content types, please tell me why this happened and how to fix it.
Thank you!
Comments
Comment #1
tky commentedHello, I posted this issue for three days and no one reply me.
Maybe I should change my question from
"Does anyone has the same problem with me?"
to
"Does anyone who used HEAD version event.module ever saw the "event_calendar" in the views setting page and views style select list?"
Please tell me for check that this is a problem of my site or event.module.
Comment #2
killes@www.drop.org commentedThe problem is that nobody ported the event_views module to Drupal 5 yet. I am hoping somebody will do that so it cacn be included again.
Comment #3
karens commentedThe event calendar has been pulled out of event views so that it isn't dependent on the event module, since it will work for other types of fields. It's now in a separate project at http://drupal.org/project/calendar.
I thought event views got ported automatically when the event module got ported since Derek had said that under the new release system contrib modules could only get ported when the 'parent' project was ported. I didn't realize anything separate needed to be done, so I'll try to do that.
Comment #4
harriska2 commentedUsed to be out there - maybe I just applied a patch but I have it working under 5.1 right now. Look at:
http://drupal.org/node/109982
and
http://drupal.org/node/103122
Not sure how good it is but it works for what I need.
Comment #5
karens commentedI misspoke. It needed to be branched. It was already ported. So the version in HEAD was working OK with 5.x, but just didn't exist in the 5.x branch.
Anyway, I branched it and it should show up in the tarball the next time the packaging script runs.
Comment #6
(not verified) commented