In my module display, I currently have the following projects and modules showing:
- Field
-
- Computed Field
- Fields
-
- Address Field
- Block reference
- Content Taxonomy
- Field permissions
- Fieldgroup
- Font Reference
- Link
- Multistep
- Name Field
- Node Reference
- Node Reference URL Widget
- References
- Select Other
- User Reference
- View reference
Would Computed Field like to join the party?
Patch attached.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #6 | computed_field_1201330.patch | 818 bytes | drewish |
| #5 | computed_field_1201330.patch | 805 bytes | drewish |
| computed_field-package_fields.patch | 423 bytes | pillarsdotnet |
Comments
Comment #1
xlyz commented+1
Comment #2
rafamd commentedAlso, we should use the "Fields" tag for the project (page).
Related duplicate: #1107254: Change "package" in .info
Comment #3
kaizerking commentedComment #4
bofrost commentedpatch looks fine, please port!
Comment #5
drewish commentedI've been applying all these—IMHO—RTBC patches to my own repo. Here's a patch compatible with git am.
Comment #6
drewish commentedI didn't properly attribute authorship in that last patch.
Comment #7
colanMarking #1397134: Change the name of the Package as a duplicate of this issue.
Comment #8
colanCommitted in 18ffa8e.