[D6] Comment Name [#1242806]

In drupal, when authenticated users post a comment, drupal use their username as the respondent. If anthenticated user want post a comment with any name like anonymous users can do, comment_name module will help.

Comment Name module add a comment_name field in comment form, users can filled this field to use the value as their name.

This is very useful for authenticated users who wants track comments post by themselves but don't want others know those comments were post by them.

Project page:
http://drupal.org/node/1242666

Git repository:

git clone http://git.drupal.org/sandbox/lugir/1242666.git comment_name

for Drupal 6

Comments

Comment #1

berkas1 commented 14 August 2011 at 21:14

Status:

Needs review

» Needs work

There is no README file in repository

Comment #2

lugir commented 14 August 2011 at 22:52

Assigned:	Unassigned	» lugir
Status:	Needs work	» Needs review

add a README file to repository :D

Comment #3

lugir commented 18 August 2011 at 23:48

Priority:

Normal

» Major

Needs review

Comment #4

klausi

he/him||they/them

German

🇦🇹 Vienna

commented 9 October 2011 at 11:04

Assigned:	lugir	» Unassigned
Priority:	Major	» Normal
Status:	Needs review	» Needs work

* Git release branch is missing, see http://drupal.org/node/1015226
* README should be README.txt
* lines in README.txt should not exceed 80 characters
* module: @file doc block is missing, see http://drupal.org/node/1354#files
* "//dsm($form);" please remove all debug statements from your code

Comment #5

jthorson commented 14 January 2012 at 21:47

It appears that there have been multiple project applications opened under your username:

Taobaoke: http://drupal.org/node/1176740
ImageLink: http://drupal.org/node/1275104
Comment Name: http://drupal.org/node/1242806

As successful completion of the project application process results in the applicant being granted the 'Create Full Projects' permission, there is no need to take multiple applications through the process. Once the first application has been successfully approved, then the applicant can promote other projects without review. Because of this, posting multiple applications is not necessary, and results in additional workload for reviewers ... which in turn results in longer wait times for everyone in the queue.

With this in mind, I have marked your secondary applications as 'closed(duplicate)', and left one application open (chosen at random).

If you prefer that we proceed through this review process with a different application than the one I that I have left open, then please feel free to close the 'open' application as a duplicate, and re-open one of the other project applications which I had closed.

Thanks in advance for your patience and understanding!