Closed (fixed)
Project:
Export DXML
Version:
master
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
12 Mar 2007 at 18:06 UTC
Updated:
24 Sep 2007 at 12:22 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
SinMiedoJuan commentedI'm also interested but I don't know how to program. Any programmer willing?
Comment #2
nancydruUpdating the title so it is clear in my recent issues list. I'll go back and look at my needs. Maybe I'll do it.
Comment #3
nancydruHere is a patch to make it work under 5.x. Additionally, you need a .info file: (I don't know how to add this to the patch.)
Comment #4
puregin commentedThanks for the poke, Nancy.
I've fixed the hook_link() implementation to be Drupal 5 compliant and supplied a .info file. Tests OK for me on Drupal 5.2.
Comment #5
SinMiedoJuan commentedTested on Drupal 5.2. Works great, here is the info:
Hope it helps.
Thanks a lot for your work
Comment #6
nancydruGreat. Will be see an official 5.x branch soon?
Comment #7
nancydruI also submitted changes to bookimport module. They were more extensive.
Comment #8
SinMiedoJuan commentedAny chance of solving the export of CCK fields?
Thanks a lot for all the work.
Comment #9
nancydruI would recommend that requirement be filed against CCK AND each of its contributed pieces. I know of one CCK add-on that doesn't even do the standard CCK export; that needs to be fixed first.
Comment #10
SinMiedoJuan commentedOk, thanks. I'll try to contact them.
Thanks for all.
Comment #11
mr.dale commentedI downloaded and installed this module and the updated book import on a stock 5.2 install. I get the following error when I click on book export(dxml) in the administer menu.
warning: call_user_func_array() [function.call-user-func-array]: First argument is expected to be a valid callback, 'book_admin_set_flag' was given in /Applications/MAMP/htdocs/test/includes/form.inc on line 217.
I'd love to use these modules, but for now I can't
Comment #12
nancydruDid you apply the patch that's attached above (not just the code shown)? That patch removes that call, so I suspect not.
Comment #13
mr.dale commentedFinally! I've been waiting about two years for this to happen. Thanks so much for your efforts NancyW
Comment #14
puregin commentedThanks, Nancy - I've committed your changes, with a bit of polish. Much appreciated - Djun
Comment #15
nancydruI'm sure the polish was needed. I just tried to make it work.
Comment #16
(not verified) commented