Closed (fixed)
Project:
Documentation
Version:
6.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Other documentation issues
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Reporter:
Created:
13 Mar 2007 at 14:16 UTC
Updated:
15 May 2009 at 01:40 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
karens commentedActually I rewrote much of the handbook after the 5.x upgrade so it should not be all that far out of date. There definitely are comments that need to be deleted because they no longer make any sense. There are also comments that are incorrect which should *not* be incorporated. I was hoping to find time to get back to this, but haven't so far. I have no ability to remove comments, so that was one thing I couldn't fix.
Comment #2
add1sun commentedI've only actually been looking at the Themers section so far and a few things stuck out, so that's great that it really is generally more updated than I thought. Specifically I was looking at things like node-content_example.tpl.php vs node-example.tpl.php (which I have since added to that page) and the discussion of pulling an individual field is somewhat confusing but I came across this in a forum post:
$node->content['field_whatever']['#value']
gives you a block element with labels as defined in your content type
$node->field_whatever[0]['view']
gives you an inline element with no labels
As comments get rolled into a page I normally just create an issue for the site admins to delete them for me. I'm certainly not going to roll things in/edit them unless I feel they are correct, that is, if I don't know - I'm leaving them alone. Anyway that I can help you out with editing please let me know since I know you are quite busy.
Comment #3
senpai commentedWould RobertDouglas' new article on CCK be of any use while editing this Book? http://www.lullabot.com/articles/an_introduction_to_the_content_construc...
Comment #4
pwolanin commentedThat lullabot article is excellent. I added a link to it on this page:
http://drupal.org/node/101742
- but please move/remove it if that's not appropriate.
Comment #5
karens commentedAbsolutely, a link to the Lullabot article is a good idea.
Comment #6
Anonymous (not verified) commentedComment #7
MGParisi commentedRefers to 5.x CCK... Marked as Fixed, since 5.x probably never will get the attention it needs on this front. Also the document is marked as "Needs Updates" so anyone who wants to find the document to improve it can...
Fixed