I don't know if this should be a feature request or a bug.

Terms with no nodes assigned to them should not be displayed.

Of course a method would be to delete those terms, but it is better to not display them.

What do you say?

This should be interpreted also as a support issue for me:P because I don't know how to avoid displaying terms with no nodes assigned to them (and keep these terms in vocabulary, not delete them).

Comments

meba’s picture

meba commented
Category: bug » feature

This is definitely feature request. Others would complain that empty terms are not displaying :-) I think it is pretty easy, add settings checkbox and then limit the list to non empty terms (possibly in SQL query?).

I have too much work now, can you try? :-) Thanks

mishhh’s picture

mishhh commented

I would do if I could... Now I'm not yet prepared for such modifications, but I'm learning...
The modifications you talk about are not hard to understand, theoretically:)

Hey is someone here to help us?:P:P

mishhh’s picture

mishhh commented

Here is what I've done for taxonomy dhtml block to display only terms with associated nodes.

In the taxonomy_dhtml_vocab_vert() function I've permitted the displaying only of those terms with $count > 0 . It is a little modification:

from this:

    $link = l(t($term->name), $url, array("title" => t($term->description)));
//    $out .= _taxonomy_depth($term->depth, " ")."- $link";
    $out .= str_repeat(" ", $term->depth) . "- $link";
    $count = taxonomy_term_count_nodes($term->tid);
    if ($count) {
      $out .= " ($count)";
    }
    $out .= "<br />";

to this:

$count = taxonomy_term_count_nodes($term->tid);
	if ($count) {
	    $link = l(t($term->name), $url, array("title" => t($term->description)));

	//    $out .= _taxonomy_depth($term->depth, "&nbsp;")."- $link";

	    $out .= str_repeat("&nbsp;", $term->depth) . "- $link";

	    $out .= " ($count)";
	    
		$out .= "<br />";
    }
meba’s picture

meba commented
Priority: Normal » Minor

This is NOT that easy :-( I am working on it right now and it needs too much tweaking:

- What if the only term which has nodes is subterm of some master term? Then we should print a master term
- This doesn't solve the same on taxonomy dhtml page

This is very minor, so i am lowering the priority, i personally doesn't have enough time to do this. Anybody?

Anonymous’s picture

Anonymous (not verified) commented
Status: Active » Closed (fixed)

This module is no longer being actively developed as it duplicates functionality that can be obtained through the usage of taxonomy_menu ( http://drupal.org/project/taxonomy_menu ) and dhtml_menu ( http://drupal.org/project/dhtml_menu ).