Closed (won't fix)
Project:
LDAP Single Sign On
Version:
6.x-1.0
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Anonymous (not verified)
Created:
10 Oct 2011 at 08:20 UTC
Updated:
15 May 2019 at 00:34 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
hotspoons commentedCould you provide more information? Are you referring to visiting /user/login/sso after already being authenticated and logged into Drupal? The main issue with that path is that to make it operate as a dynamic menu item (it should install a menu item in the Navigation menu), it needs to have access tied to if a user is authenticated or not. The login link from this module should disappear once a user is authenticated, so unless a user is bookmarking and visiting the /user/login/sso path, it should only appear when a user is not authenticated.
I suppose a more robust access callback could be written for the menu item to perform a redirection instead of access is denied when accessing the link after logged in, but it complicates things.
Let me know exactly your issue and I'll try to accommodate. Thanks.
Comment #2
hotspoons commentedNo response in 6 months. Closing.
Comment #3
alexanderrozenson commentedSay, I want to use the module for only one specific content-type and especially node/add/[specialtype] page,
Would I be able to configure a vhost on my apache so that only special alias will use NTLM credentials?
I guess I can do that but what about users(editors) which are already logged in to my wikiportal? I think they will get Access denied - instead I want to redirect them to node/add/[specialtype]... And yes I must use user/login/sso :-( and also change drupal_goto('home'); to whatever I need.
Thank ahead,
Sasha
Comment #4
alexanderrozenson commentedI can do the same with rules of course, for example:
create a page with fancy url alias
triger a rule to check for anonymous role,
if true => redirect to sso login,
false => redirect to node/add/[some-type]
and change only the drupal_goto('home'); row but it would be great to have such thing on the settings page
Comment #5
grahlThe use case with user-specified routes is better supported with user groups plus rules and/or custom code. Closing this issue.
Comment #6
naidim commentedSorry, right issue, wrong version.