Active
Project:
Views Bulk Operations (VBO)
Version:
7.x-3.0-beta3
Component:
User interface
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
21 Nov 2011 at 03:20 UTC
Updated:
19 May 2014 at 04:05 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
Anonymous (not verified) commentedThat would be of interest for me too! Right now I create a single component for each option so that my users dont have to see the direct input.
A short answer to this would be to alter the form I guess. ;) As far as I can see, the form is created by rules, so this issue needs to be posted in the rules issue queue as well!?
Comment #2
xcono commentedYes, You're right!
And good idea about form_alter! Thank you!
Comment #3
Anonymous (not verified) commentedWell right now I'm working with a basic form alter like this one:
This does not much. It checks for the right form and current step in the vbo form process. The second check hides the select from the confirmation form. After that, I check if a parameter is given for the textfield I want to alter (just double checking). If that is okay, I load the field to get the values and put this into a select that I use, instead of the textfield. At last I unset the button, because it has no meaning for me.
That's it…
Comment #4
s_u_s_a_f_o_n commentedThanks to mikewink, that's good way!
Comment #5
xcono commentedThx, mikewink, for example.
Comment #6
jamix commentedThank you mikewink, works beautifully!
Comment #7
muschpusch commentedNot sure but I think this fixed in the last dev release of VBO: #1392692: Support changing order state/status with an order rule This could be kind of related
Comment #8
Yuri commentedHas this ever been implemented in VBO? (Not for Commerce)