Closed (fixed)
Project:
DrupalCon Denver 2012 Website
Component:
Content
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
15 Dec 2011 at 00:53 UTC
Updated:
22 Jan 2012 at 22:40 UTC
With the opening of Core Conversation session submissions on January 1, we'd like to have adequate publicity, so probably a blog post from Drupalcon, tweets, etc. I think Dries will also blog. I'd be happy to write something, or we can just go with a standard announcement recycled.
Thanks!
Comments
Comment #1
rfayHere's a blog article that may be used. Note that the links must be filled in correctly before it can be used.
Comment #2
webchickOne addition to make to that post, which otherwise looks great, is that this is going to be like DrupalCon Chicago/London where the Core Conversations is a track happening during the normal conference. Been getting a few questions about whether it would be "pre-con" or "during-con" from various folks.
Comment #3
cyberswat commentedI agree ... we should be completely clear that core conversations happen concurrently with the regular schedule as we have hosted both approaches in the past.
I feel that your targeting a different demographic than the regular sessions and have the expectation that your session submitters will send you quality submissions. Otherwise, I would suggest a few notes on the importance of verbosity to avoid submissions along the lines of "I am FOO therefore you should select me". You may also want to highlight that the cutoff for submissions is a firm deadline and that late submissions will not be considered without a high amount of wand waving and pixie dust. I've noticed a bit of ... procrastination ... when it comes to these kinds of deadlines.
Nice write-up Randy.
Comment #4
webchickWell.... in this context, I actually think "I am FOO and you should select me" is perfectly fine. I attend Core Conversations because I want to hear from all the FOOs. If I'm interested in only hearing from FOOs who also happen to be good at putting a session proposal together, and/or are excellent speakers, then I will attend the main Con.
However, I agree that putting at least enough time into a proposal so it is understandable by people who don't set their home page to /project/issues/drupal is a good thing, and we should encourage that. ;)
Comment #5
webchickI also think we should make the deadline as close to the con as possible, if we're not going to let it slip. The reason these things tend to slip btw isn't because people are lazy, it's because there might literally be some radical new awesome community initiative that simply doesn't materialize until 2 weeks before the con when people are in DrupalCon fever. We should go for the best possible session material, not get hung up on dates and process, IMO. :)
Comment #6
coltraneIs this ready to go? Edit: Or if the dates are being changed let's continue discussion.
Comment #7
rfaySorry, I'm working on other things in Nicaragua and haven't been too available. I'm taking the liberty of marking this RTBC. Neither Dries nor Cress responded about changing the date, and of course session submitters need time to prepare their sessions as well (and with these dates end up with just a month). So let's leave the dates as is. I added a sentence about it being a parallel track.
I have no objection to minor edits to this as you see useful. Note that the links have to be fixed of course.
Comment #8
coltraneThis will go out tomorrow (Monday) unless there is any other news being published. I'll coordinate with the rest of the team.
Comment #9
rfayThanks so much!