To comply with Doxygen and comment formatting conventions with regard to the "Documenting files" section.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #4 | 1394324-file-docblock-4.patch | 412 bytes | Anonymous (not verified) |
| #1 | 1394324-file-docblock-1.patch | 412 bytes | Anonymous (not verified) |
Comments
Comment #1
Anonymous (not verified) commentedAnd here's a patch.
Comment #2
Anonymous (not verified) commentedChanging status to 'needs review'.
Comment #3
dcrocks commentedShouldn't "Seven's theme implementation" be "Seven theme's implementation"
Comment #4
Anonymous (not verified) commentedIn looking at Bartik and Omega I assumed this was the standard format. But Zen uses the format you suggest, and it does make more sense. Here's the updated patch, but Bartik should probably also be reformatted for consistency in core themes.
Comment #5
dcrocks commentedIt depends on whether the sentence says
1) (Seven)'s (theme implementation) to...
or
2) (Seven theme)'s (implementation) to...
What's the correct grammar? To me there is an implied 'The' as:
@file(This file is) The Seven theme's implementation to....
It seems that correct grammar is important in Drupal, looking at comments on other patches. I like (2) but someone else may have better justification either way.
Comment #6
Anonymous (not verified) commentedFrom reading here: http://api.drupal.org/api/drupal/core--modules--system--theme.api.php/gr..., it would seem that the first patch is more in line with the documentation at least. According to the docs, a "theme implementation" includes template files.
Comment #7
valthebaldFixed by another issue - seven's page.tpl.php contains @file docblock