Closed (outdated)
Project:
Radioactivity
Version:
7.x-2.0-rc1
Component:
Documentation
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
4 Jan 2012 at 21:40 UTC
Updated:
26 Jan 2018 at 13:46 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
madeby commentedI think it is adding the energy now but not right away. How and when is the energy added to the field?
Comment #2
neomenlo commentedI've been struggling with this too.
Although, I don't think your use case of rules makes sense. The field for the content type should do that automatically. Try making it show the raw value in "manage display" for the content type and see if it increments.
I can't get rules to work, but the energy doesn't automatically increment using the field either, so I suspect there's a bigger bug in my installation.
Comment #3
madeby commentedI also have a problem with the field. See here: http://drupal.org/node/1393848
Comment #4
neomenlo commentedI had two issues that I had to fix.
It sounds like the problem for you is this one: http://drupal.org/node/1396092
You may also have this issue, which you might want to look into. http://drupal.org/node/1396088
Comment #5
tcmug commentedFYI:
There are now two new Rules actions in the dev version (or currently in the head version - its waiting to be generated). These are:
Set energy
Get maximum energy
The set energy is basically the same as Set value but its using the Radioactivitys internals for the task.
Note that "Add incident" only add an incident to the processing queue using the fields decay profiles storage class. Set energy simply sets the current value of a field to the given value.
Comment #6
Anonymous (not verified) commentedWhat's the difference between these two? As I can see, "set energy" requires a variable for input, while with "set value" I can use a static value or a field/variable (this even with a static offset).
So I wonder, if I can use the "set value" for setting and resetting the field without screwing up Radioactivity internals. It would spare me the use of an additional "add variable" action.
Comment #7
sutharsan commentedIssue triage: Closing issue due to lack of activity.
If you believe this issue is closed in error, feel free to re-open.