Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal Community Governance
Component:
Policies
Priority:
Major
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
21 Mar 2012 at 22:53 UTC
Updated:
30 Apr 2013 at 19:00 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
mile23Some documents to consider and immediately patch bugs within.
Comment #2
rfayNew title... if OK with you.
If you look at Debian or Wikipedia or a number of projects, they have *very* version-controlled documents, and explicitly name and date their final versions.
I don't know for sure whether this is right for the Drupal community (or whether it's too aggressive for us right now) but it sure does bring to mind what those communities do.
The more I think about this the more I'm in favor of explicitly stating how Drupal works. Not sure it needs to be in git source control, but maybe it does.
Comment #3
coderintherye commentedShouldn't our governance pages be wikis surely? Perhaps, permission controlled ones, but still that would be a better format no?
Comment #4
mile23Nice title change, thanks rfay.
Documents could be published in a fashion similar to api.drupal.org, using doxy formatting or some other markup system. People could file bug reports against the process with proposed changes. Discussion would be within issues, as is the Way Of Drupal.
Wiki/in-browser-editable documents might be more manageable for many users, of course. No need to exclude those who aren't proficient in git or making patches.
Comment #5
matthews commentedwiki +1
Comment #6
itangalo commentedIf the ideas of "curated docs" goes through (which seems to be the case), I think governance documents would fit very well into it.
The "curated docs" basically means documentation that is managed by a team, rather than open to anyone to edit. In this case it would be documentation about Drupal governance, and changes would be version controlled like any other documentation pages.
Comment #7
leehunter commentedOne key document would be the Terms of Reference (ToR) for the governance body (or bodies) which at a minimum should say:
It's also a good idea to have a set of a broad principles (the fewer the better) which the governance body can use as guidance in their decisions. These might be incorporated into the ToR or stated separately.
Comment #8
webchickSo I believe this has effectively been done.
The main working group charters are housed in Git in http://drupalcode.org/project/governance.git. Dries is the only one with commit access to this project.
The working groups themselves can follow a similar approach. We've created http://drupal.org/project/drupal-cwg for the Community Working Group, for example, and will check in and maintains policies like the DCoC there in Git as well.
Suggestions to wording, etc. can be filed as issues against the respective projects.
Also created http://drupal.org/governance as a future "jumping-off point" to community governance-related group descriptions + policies.
Comment #9
webchickAlso cross-linking #1516540: Develop a technique to mark (and group) policy pages on Drupal.org.
Comment #10
mile23Nice. :-)