Hi,
I have a weird problem when running amazon-6.x-1.4 under views-6.x-3.0: The settings for certain "Amazon" fields are not being saved, for example "Amazon: All participants".
This field has settings to drill down the scope of the returned data ("Participant restriction"), e.g. it can be limited to "Author", "Director", "Actor", etc. Im' using two "Amazon: All participants" fields in one of my Views, one for "Director", and one for "Actor"; both fields have a "Participant restriction". After saving the View, the "Participant restriction" is gone, and both fields are set to "Show all participants". When the View is being run, the "Participant restriction" doesn't kick in, either.
I have tried to alter the Views' configuration a number of times, cleared all caches multiple times (drush cc and/or via 'admin_menu'), but each time I edit or run the View, both fields do "Show all participants". I'm using the block display, but the View also has a 'node_content' display (incompatible with Views 3).
Attaching a screenshot of the Views' block output; the redundant data is marked with yellow text marker, and of the Views' field settings. Also attaching an export of the complete View.
Thanks, if someone can make any sense of of!
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| amazon_participant_restriction.jpeg | 24.03 KB | asb | |
| amazon_views3_export.txt | 129.03 KB | asb | |
| amazon_participants_director_actor.jpeg | 17.56 KB | asb |
Comments
Comment #1
rfayHmm. I don't think *any* testing has been done with Views 6.x-3.x
Comment #2
asb commentedAnyone? Am I the only one using Views 3, or does it work for anybody but me?
Thanks!
Comment #3
rfayI note that 6.x-2.x of views is still the recommended. Views 7.x-3.x has been no end of pain, requiring a critical fix every few months. Yuck. Don't want to be on that bandwagon.
I imagine that your 6.x-3.x issue is #1209370: SQL Error in All Participants
Comment #4
asb commentedI don't understand the technical details in #1209370, but it sounds related.
Comment #5
asb commentedAny progress on the Views 3.x front?