Action items for Policy Proposal for Closed Groups [#1542250]

If the guidelines for closed groups is adopted, the following groups would be affected.

Critical
Regional groups in this list should be considered abandoned and immediate action (opening group, approving members, seeking new organizers) should be taken.

Group	Member Count	Organizer	Organizer's Last activity
guangzhou	1 member (24)	HansR	Sept 2007
chennai-drupal-group	1 member (30)	dorait	July 2011
package-manager	3 members (16)		Suggest archiving
migrating-joomla	4 members (17)	b2design	Jan 2011
kenya	10 members (21)	kabogo	Nov 2008
co-maintainers-projects	32 members (28)	AjK	April 2008
form-api	55 members (30)	chx	June 2012

Major
5 or more pending member requests I consider major.

Group	Member Count	Organizer	Organizer's Last activity
Botswana	1 member (6)	segamatale	Sept 2011
se-ks-ne-ok-sw-mo-nw-ar-rural-area	7 members (6)	Jee	Aug 2011
uchicago	12 members (7)	froboy	Feb 2012
advanced-data-driven-applications	25 members (5)	jptillman	May 2012
california-highered	54 members (7)	coderintherye	Feb 2012

Normal
These groups just have one organizer.

Group	Member Count	Organizer	Organizer's Last activity
southern-sudan	1 member (1)	Kuriawega	May 2012
namibia	4 members (1)	SandStorm	Jan 2011
drupal-aceh	5 members (1)	Mseuno	Dec 2010
malta	5 members	spidermaster	May 2012
pajamanation	7 members (3)	mixel	Sept 2011
tri-cities-tennessee	7 members (1)	Imaaxa-Cory	Dec 2011
drupal-pacifica	15 members (1)	Lynnold	Feb 2010
niger	15 members (1)	RONA ABA Aboubacar	Dec 2010 (the other organizer has no activity)
university-texas-austin	16 members (1)	gravelpot	June 2012
castillayleon	19 members (1)	continental	May 2012
iceland	23 members (1)	einarps April 2011	imerlin May 2011
drupal-microfinance	31 members	dgoutam	April 2012
tinymce-development	33 members (3)	kreynen	June 2012
rajkot-india	53 members	beautifulmind	May 2012
voip-drupal	279 members	leoburd	June 2012

Minor

Group	Member Count	Notes
puducherry	18 members	three organizers
druforum-drupal-netforum-integration	30 members	pdube Nov 2009 (2 organizers, but they're the same user.)
tennessee	33 members	bryrockMarch 2012 jlmeredith Nov 2011
yale-university	82 members (1)	nflowers1228 June 2012 rrode Sept 2010
vietnam	519 members	seven organizers.

Comments

Comment #1

silverwing CreditAttribution: silverwing commented 26 June 2012 at 07:52

Title:	Policy Proposal for Closed Groups	» Action items for Policy Proposal for Closed Groups
Component:	Miscellaneous	» Content moderation
Category:	feature	» task

Comment #1.0

silverwing CreditAttribution: silverwing commented 27 June 2012 at 01:18

Issue summary:

View changes

Comment #1.1

silverwing CreditAttribution: silverwing commented 27 June 2012 at 01:38

Issue summary:

View changes

tablefying

Comment #1.2

silverwing CreditAttribution: silverwing commented 27 June 2012 at 01:43

Issue summary:

View changes

link

Comment #2

gisle

he/him

Norwegian Bokmål

Norway

CreditAttribution: gisle as a volunteer commented 2 July 2015 at 06:55

Component:

Content moderation

» User Account

Nothing seem to have happend to this issue since it was posted three years ago. I would like to nudge it forwards.

However, rather than opening it up, I request that the abandoned group Co-Maintainers for Projects is deleted (or that its description is updated to point users to the correct documentation for requesting co-maintainers and taking over abandoned projects).

This group as it currently exists only serve to confuse and mislead people about these things.

If this group for some reason cannot be deleted, then comment posting should be locked, and the description of it should be replaced with the following:

This group is abandoned. If you're seeking co-maintainers for your project, please follow the procedure outlined in Finding new maintainer or co-maintainer for your project. If you want to become the new maintainer of an abandoned project , please follow the process for dealing with abandoned projects.