Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal core
Version:
8.0.x-dev
Component:
configuration system
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
8 May 2012 at 19:30 UTC
Updated:
29 Jul 2014 at 20:41 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
sunComment #2
sunAdjusted docs and renamed DrupalVerifiedStorageSQL into DatabaseStorage.
Comment #4
sunFWIW, with this patch,
core\lib\Drupal\Core\Config> dir /Byields:Comment #5
sunOdd. #2 should apply cleanly. Trying again.
Comment #6
sunBriefly discussed the "Abstract" prefix in IRC. Removed it, as it's not strictly necessary and lines up Storage.php with StorageInterface.php:
Comment #7
yched commentedDenoting the abstract nature of the class within the class name is precious IMO.
Shouldn't be a blocker for this patch, but I wish we settled some convention regarding those "abstract" classes - opened #1567920: Naming standard for abstract/base classes about that.
Comment #8
gddI don't have a strong feeling on this but based on the results of #1567920: Naming standard for abstract/base classes it appears that a standard has been essentially decided, so I'm putting this to CNW since it will undoubtedly need a reroll.
Otherwise I'm liking this a lot. Thanks sun.
Comment #9
sunRenamed Storage to StorageBase.
FWIW, this change is also available as a pull-able branch in cmi/config-classes-1567812-sun
(At some point, I'd like to have some clarity on what patches will be merged and which not, 'cos creating and maintaining feature branches involves a certain overhead.)
Comment #11
sun#9: config.classes.9.patch queued for re-testing.
Comment #12
gddI haven't been maintaining feature branches for anything of late, although I was thinking about it for the rearchitecture issue since it is a more colossal change. I agree it is all pretty loose at this point and it would be nice to have some standards.
Comment #13
sunAlright, "Drupal installation failed" was a testbot hiccup. Ready to fly?
Comment #14
gddAyup
Comment #15
sun#9: config.classes.9.patch queued for re-testing.
Comment #16
catchWe're over thresholds but internal stuff in cmi can't possibly conflict with any critical issues so I've gone ahead and committed this one.