Closed (won't fix)
Project:
Subscriptions
Version:
7.x-1.0-beta3
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
15 May 2012 at 10:42 UTC
Updated:
27 Sep 2019 at 14:05 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
salvisI'm pretty sure that term hierarchy is completely ignored.
Comment #2
artatac commentedA shame not to at lease have that option, perhaps turned off by default
Comment #3
salvisThat rubs me the wrong way.
Comment #4
artatac commentedSorry Salis, that was not my intention. How could I have phrased it better?
Comment #5
salvisMy turn to apologize: I'm not a native English speaker and I misunderstood 'shame' for 'disgrace' (see here). I'm sorry for reacting too strongly.
This would add considerable overhead to node creation/updating. We would have to be able to turn it on selectively per vocabulary, and on a site with lots of users you might not like the resulting performance hit.
Do you know whether the taxonomy_access and tac_lite modules support term hierarchies as you propose? I'm not even sure what my own forum_access module would do if we were to allow subscribing to forum containers... I do know that FA does not support inheriting permissions. This looks like a can of worms...
Comment #6
salvis