Needs review
Project:
Update Status Advanced Settings
Version:
7.x-1.x-dev
Component:
User interface
Priority:
Minor
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
1 Jun 2012 at 21:09 UTC
Updated:
27 Jan 2015 at 00:48 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
aohrvetpv commentedSeems sensible to me. I usually use the notes to document why a particular update is ignored, but I see no reason it could not be used for other purposes.
Note that this patch violates two current coding standards for consistency with the existing code:
1. No documentation of parameter/return types.
2. No blank line between @param and @return comments.
Comment #2
aohrvetpv commentedIgnore previous patch.
Comment #3
aohrvetpv commentedThe function name
update_advanced_get_project_admin_note()would maybe be more consistent withupdate_advanced_is_project_ignored()thanupdate_advanced_get_admin_note(), which lacks the word project.Comment #4
aohrvetpv commentedCorrection: Omitting data types in function comments is not a violation of coding standards as I said in #1. Data types are only required for D8.
Comment #5
aohrvetpv commentedREADME.txt needs to be updated accordingly.
Comment #6
aohrvetpv commentedUpdates #2 to clarify README.txt documentation of administrator note feature. With this change, administrator notes are not necessarily used to record the reason releases are ignored.
This README.txt change may not be necessary.