Since it stores the item's body text, it ought to be called body, rather than description.

I filed under 6, as this seems like a clear over-sight, but in case it's too major to fix there, please re-file against 7.

Comments

chx’s picture

Version: 6.x-dev » 7.x-dev
maartenvg’s picture

StatusFileSize
new5.99 KB

Created a patch for this, and seems to work fine.

The only problem I have is that I couldn't get the aggregator_update_7001() to be detected during the running of update.php (even though {system} says that the schema_version is 7000). Or should I have added it to system.install? (fixed by separate issue)

maartenvg’s picture

Status: Active » Needs review

double post

Anonymous’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch failed testing.

maartenvg’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new4.76 KB

Chasing HEAD, it failed due to the DB-TNG. Added comment to aggregator_update_7001().

dries’s picture

I'm not sure about this one. It is actually called 'description' in the RSS specification. I don't know at the top of my head what it is called in the Atom specification. If it is called 'body' in the Atom specification, this patch might fly.

maartenvg’s picture

For atom is appears to be "content", so neither 'description' or 'body'.

Status: Needs review » Needs work

The last submitted patch failed testing.

Crell’s picture

Component: database system » aggregator.module

I don't see how this is a DB system issue. It's part of aggregator module. I defer to those folks as to whether or not it's still relevant, as I know a lot of work went into that module in Drupal 7.

Crell’s picture

Given the work that's gone into Drupal 8's aggregator module, is this issue even still relevant? I would think not...

mimes’s picture

It's still an issue for Drupal 7's aggregator module, though. aggregator_item.description is still described as "body of the feed item".

Crell’s picture

Yes, but we can't rename the field in Drupal 7 at this point, and I don't think it even exists in the same form in Drupal 8. So is this a won't fix?

berdir’s picture

Issue summary: View changes
Status: Needs work » Closed (works as designed)

It still exists in the same way but I don't really see the point in doing this.

Just like the GUID, description is something used in RSS and possibly other feed standards.