As we found out in #1467820-13: Unknown data property og_membership in EntityStructureWrapper->getPropertyInfo() the current spable release 1.0-alpha3 has a seriously broken uuid_entity_property_info_alter() which causes other modules to break.
so please please roll a new stable release.

Comments

skwashd’s picture

Category: bug » task

I'm taking a long weekend off with the family. I think it is worth reviewing some patches and doing some QA next week before considering a new release.

geek-merlin’s picture

cool! ;-)

cotto’s picture

Any time would be great for a release to address this known issue. I just burned the last three hours hunting it down, and I'd be delighted if I were the last one to have to do so.

skwashd’s picture

We discussed a new release in Munich. There are a couple of bugs we want to fix before cutting the new release. Expect something soon.

cotto’s picture

Excellent. Thanks!

zhangtaihao’s picture

Is there a listing somewhere for issues/bugs on the roadmap so that we can contribute/follow? I've just been trawling through all D7 UUID issues and couldn't really get an idea of which ones are pending (apart from some recent updates).

somimi’s picture

Please please please, any updates on this HUGE issue? UUID has broken Rules for my client's site, which is Not Okay.

warmth’s picture

Any news?

greg.1.anderson’s picture

The latest stable release (alpha3) gives many notices due to #1810226: Error message when deploying a site: Undefined variable: $replacements, but the latest dev release is working fine for me.

rcross’s picture

Any news?

Not sure if this might product an alpha4 or a beta1 or maybe even an RC?

aaronbauman’s picture

bump

amirdt22’s picture

This got me too.

kevinquillen’s picture

Priority: Critical » Major

A new release should be put out as soon as possible. I've had fatal PHP errors with both Commerce and other modules that utilize UUID, which updating to dev fixes.

I would be willing to bet that the alpha release from January 2012 breaks a lot of modules, and it has been a year.

kevinquillen’s picture

Priority: Major » Critical
kevinquillen’s picture

Priority: Major » Critical

If the maintainers feel like granting me commit access I would be more than willing to shuffle this along.

skwashd’s picture

The deploy-revisions branch will need to be reviewed and merged before a new release is cut. Our test coverage is slipping too. There is nothing stopping people from using git snapshots.

skwashd’s picture

Priority: Critical » Normal

Fixing priority.

xamount’s picture

I concur that a new release should be rolled as soon as possible, even without the pending stuff. (it's been since June 2012 since users have been asking for this).

Also the Rules module is breaking because of this module (which has been fixed in dev by the way). Please refer to this thread for more information: #1792524: code error which causes adding new condition to not do anything when user clicks on "Continue" green button

xamount’s picture

Priority: Normal » Critical

Putting back priority to critical as this is causing other modules to break, also affecting lots of developers and development time consequently.

kevinquillen’s picture

There's nothing stopping devs from using the dev branch, no, but for others who update modules from Drupal admin (trust me, they're out there)- they get punched in the gut. Handled three external cases this month revolving around UUID.

skwashd’s picture

Priority: Critical » Major

This is a problem with an alpha release, the priority is major not critical. Please stop playing with the priority.

xamount’s picture

If you want to change the priority to "major" and not "critical", at least put a message on the module's page (in bold at the top and in red) telling users to not use this module because it breaks a lot of stuff, it wastes developer's time trying to hunt the issue down and affects a lot of people.

kevinquillen’s picture

Modules that rely on UUID have been broken since alpha3 and wound up finding ways to not depend on UUID due to the fatal errors.

Jackinloadup’s picture

skwashd what is needed to move forward with this issue?

slefevre1’s picture

I would like to see a stable release; we have a site where we wanted to use uuid for node_export, but we couldn't because of a conflict with rules. Dev branch is not an option for us because of company policy.

kevinquillen’s picture

This is a pretty fatal bug - I can't see why a quick release can be generated to correct it. It is misleading to have alpha3 marked stable when it will break your site if certain other modules are present (Rules, Commerce, etc).

mgifford’s picture

@populist made a good list in #8, many of the issues there are now RTBC. How do we get them fixed. Any others missing?

Seems the alpha is less than stable and that everyone's recommending using the dev version of the module.

Maybe the alpha should be removed for now.

greg.1.anderson’s picture

I am in agreement with #27. alpha3 is 15 months old, and the current dev is much better. If there are too many open issues to make a final release, then an alpha4 or beta1 release should be pushed out, and the remaining open issues could be addressed as time permits.

yannickoo’s picture

Wow, we are 52 commits ahead of the current release. Spent 4 hours to figure out that tokens for field collections aren't available because of wrong logic in hook_entity_property_info_alter (#1427462: Variable overwrite in uuid_entity_property_info_alter()).

Just sent an email to dixon_ (maintainer) and asked him when he will release a new version.

dixon_’s picture

Status: Active » Fixed

A new release is rolled. Sorry to have kept you all waiting.

yannickoo’s picture

Finally! <3

mgifford’s picture

Thanks!

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.