Download & Extend
Image Matrix » Issues

Not showing image matrix after last update

Posted by mariodrupal on July 27, 2012 at 2:34pm
Project:Image Matrix
Version:7.x-1.x-dev
Component:Code
Category:bug report
Priority:normal
Assigned:Unassigned
Status:closed (fixed)

Issue Summary

Hi,
I had a working image matrix before update. Now it does not work any more.
Ideas?

Login or register to post comments

Comments

#1

Posted by mariodrupal on July 27, 2012 at 7:00pm

Update.
the error found in logs:

Notice: Undefined index: type in imagematrix_field_formatter_view() (linea 313 di /home/myaccount/public_html/sites/all/modules/imagematrix/imagematrix.field.inc).

#2

Posted by maciej.zgadzaj on July 28, 2012 at 11:08am
Status:active» postponed (maintainer needs more info)

What field type are you using as the source of your images?

#3

Posted by mariodrupal on July 28, 2012 at 5:22pm

Well, I had a photo field added to taxonomy term, and made a term view that was working well with the previous release. With the last release tried a content view of photo fields but always get the same error message.

#4

Posted by maciej.zgadzaj on July 29, 2012 at 2:47pm

Sorry, but there is no photo field, not that I would know of anyway. You meant an image field I assume? The most recent version still works fine with imagefields, also in taxonomy entities (just re-tested).

Could you provide screenshots of your IM view and field configuration?

#5

Posted by IRONFELIX on July 30, 2012 at 8:56am

I have the same problem.
After I've commented tree lines from 313 all began work.
// if ($item['type'] != 'image') {
// continue;
// }

#6

Posted by maciej.zgadzaj on July 30, 2012 at 11:51am

Ok, could you var_dump (or anything similar) content of your $item for me please?

#7

Posted by IRONFELIX on July 30, 2012 at 12:59pm

Here you are

AttachmentSize
var_dump.zip 473 bytes

#8

Posted by maciej.zgadzaj on July 30, 2012 at 2:42pm

Thanks IRONFELIX! Interesting - you're using normal image type field?

#9

Posted by IRONFELIX on July 30, 2012 at 5:15pm

Yes. It's the standart image field.

#10

Posted by maciej.zgadzaj on July 30, 2012 at 6:00pm
Status:postponed (maintainer needs more info)» fixed

Ok, then I guess for some reason your standard image field works differently from mine. Anyway, new version just pushed, should work fine now.

#11

Posted by System Message on August 13, 2012 at 6:01pm
Status:fixed» closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.