Closed (fixed)
Project:
CCK Taxonomy Super Select Ultra
Version:
5.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Miscellaneous
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
30 Sep 2007 at 04:27 UTC
Updated:
16 Oct 2007 at 02:12 UTC
Comments
Comment #1
rconstantine commentedIf you have CONTENT_TYPE_A and CONTENT_TYPE_B, and you want to use VOCAB_X and VOCAB_Y with A, and VOCAB_Y and VOCAB_Z with B, then all you do to CONTENT_TYPE_A is add two CCK_SSU fields to it, one tied to VOCAB_X and the other tied to VOCAB_Y. Same goes for Y and Z with B. If neither vocab is required for a given content type, then both should show up as collapsed fieldsets and won't take up too much space. So you could add more than two vocabs to each content type if you wish, and you can use the same vocabs with multiple content types too. For example, using the content types and vocabs I've already outlined, you could reuse the CCK_SSU field from CONTENT_TYPE_A with CONTENT_TYPE_B; it should be found in the drop down list when you go to add a new field. That is, so long as you don't want to change any of the 'global' settings for that field.
Does that answer your question?
Comment #2
najibx commentedyes. I understood. I will be using OG_vocab. Each group will create their own vocab. So, I guess there's will be too many vocab even though it's collapsed fieldsets. May not suitable for now but I guess it will be perfect for different requiremetn. Now I am looking at enabling freetagging for many vocabs but giving users the ease to submit content. "add content here" functionality which only display the corresponding vocab is the best, still searching for an answer ...
BTW, it's a nice module.
Comment #3
(not verified) commented