@see title. Probably got accidentally removed while re-factoring the field ui overview pages.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #9 | 1824180-9.patch | 2.76 KB | fubhy |
| #5 | 1824180-5.patch | 3.12 KB | fubhy |
| #2 | 1824180-2.patch | 864 bytes | fubhy |
| field-ui-admin-path.patch | 749 bytes | fubhy |
Comments
Comment #1
Stalski commentedShouldn't this be this->adminPath?
Comment #2
fubhy commentedWhoops, we actually have a property for the admin path.
Comment #3
fubhy commented@Stalski: Yes :P
Comment #4
webchickCan we add some quick test coverage of this code path?
Comment #5
fubhy commentedSure... Here we go:
Comment #6
swentel commentedFine for me.
Comment #7
fubhy commented:)
Comment #8
webchickSorry, one more round...
(nitpick) Please shorten so it fits to 80 characters.
It's very strange to put test modules for Field stuff in System module.
We already have a core/modules/field/tests/modules/field_test module that implements several alter hooks; can we just move this code over there?
Comment #9
fubhy commentedRight... Good point.
Comment #10
swentel commentedI'm just wondering if this doesn't trigger any notices as the 'no_fields' content type doesn't always exists - unless we really really don't have any manage display tests (which could be the case) ?
Comment #11
fubhy commentedunset() never triggers a notice if the array key that is going to be unset does not exist.
Comment #12
swentel commentedOk then :)
Comment #13
xjm#9: 1824180-9.patch queued for re-testing.
Comment #14
fubhy commented#9: 1824180-9.patch queued for re-testing.
Comment #15
catchThanks! Committed/pushed to 8.x.
Comment #16
fubhy commentedDidn't happen :)
Comment #17
catchOops, trying again.