Closed (fixed)
Project:
Viewfield
Version:
5.x-1.2
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
16 Oct 2007 at 02:05 UTC
Updated:
18 Feb 2008 at 00:41 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
Lowell commentedI am a new user myself, but since no-one else has responded I will give this a try...
the view field is attached after contemplate does its work
you didn't mention anything about arguments. I think you need to specify an argument for the view.
At least make sure your view works on its own first.
gluck
Comment #2
darren ohI just found that nothing will show up if a view uses Node ID as an argument. Is this what others are experiencing?
Comment #3
Zoologico commentedI don't think that was it since I did check if the View worked on its own, but thanks for the tip.
Comment #4
darren ohEven if a view works on its own, it will not show in a view field if the node ID is used as an argument.
Comment #5
jeffvogelsang commentedThat's the behavior I am getting trying to do a view that shows nodereferenced items. If I use %nid, the view fails in my CCK node. If I call it the view directly from a url, it works.
Comment #6
jeffvogelsang commentedAs a follow-up to this...
If I make my argument handling code in the view module this:
The viewfield works in my CCK node.
I am worried about using that in 15 places though and having it break when 1.3 comes out. Is 1.3 coming out any time soon, and is it expect to fix these argument issues? This is hard to troubleshoot, and feels brittle to maintain.
Comment #7
Sterlingwh commentedI'm getting a similar issue, using the page url with %nid argument works, as does using the insertview module with %nid in the body field, but when using the viewfield with %nid I'm getting reverse results of what the view should.
This seems to be related only to %nid because I'm using another viewfield in the same content type but it is filtered by a taxonomy term argument and is displaying correctly.
Comment #8
darren ohHere's my patch.
Comment #9
Anonymous (not verified) commentedThe viewfield.module CVS revision 1.3.2.13 has this bug fixed. Update your module to DRUPAL-5 revision to fix this problem.
Comment #10
Anonymous (not verified) commentedAutomatically closed -- issue fixed for two weeks with no activity.