views_styles

Hi nguerrero,

It appears that there have been multiple project applications opened under your username:

views_styles: http://drupal.org/node/1846248
ie_must_die: http://drupal.org/node/1846732

As successful completion of the project application process results in the applicant being granted the ´Create Full Projects´ permission, there is no need to take multiple applications through the process. Once the first application has been successfully approved, then the applicant can promote other projects without review. Because of this, posting multiple applications is not necessary, and results in additional workload for reviewers ... which in turn results in longer wait times for everyone in the queue. With this in mind, your secondary applications have been marked as ´closed(duplicate)´, with only the oldest application left open.

If you prefer that we proceed through this review process with a different application than the one which was left open, then feel free to close the ´open´ application as a duplicate, and re-open one of the project applications which had been closed.

Hi there,

I was looking to review your project however I am getting a message "warning, remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to checkout" with this url git clone http://git.drupal.org/sandbox/nguerrero/1845622.git views_styles.

Ok I tried that but it's asking for your git password though?

Removing review bonus tag, you have not done any manual review, you just posted the output of an automated review tool. Make sure to read through the source code of the other projects.

update repo

Hi nguerrero,

I found some minor issues probably you missed:

views_styles.info:
1. Line 6: I've found a misspelled "dependence[]" - this should be removed since there is another dependencies[] = views at Line 3.
2. Line 4: You specified package = Views Styles. Usually there is no need to specify separate package for your module unless it's a module group. Recommendations can be found here: http://drupal.org/node/231036. You can even consider specifying it as package = Views since it's related to views and it extends Views.

3. README.txt file is not that helpful. It looks like it contains only authors section and no description at all.
Please take a moment to make your README.txt follow the
guidelines for in-project documentation.

4. You don't have to use \ to escape characters if you use "string" to enclose your text.

'#description' => t("If checked, the Group\'s header will be used to do the flip effect."),

5. Since project page had no description on how to test the module it's imposible to get it without checking the code.
Please take a moment to make your project page follow tips for a great project page.

6. Some of your lines are very long. Please consider following line length coding standards to improve code readability.

Thanks for your effort!
Good job so far!

Closing due to lack of activity. Feel free to reopen if you are still working on this application.

If you reopen this please keep in mind that we are currently quite busy with all the project applications and I can only review projects with a review bonus. Please help me reviewing and I'll take a look at your project right away :-)

Also, you should get your friends, colleagues or other community members involved to review this application. Let them go through the review checklist and post a comment that sets this issue to "needs work" (found some problems with the project) or "reviewed & tested by the community" (found no major flaws).

removed automated reviews