question about the paypal button on drupal.org

lapurd - March 6, 2005 - 21:04

What use is a paypal button on drupal.org when there exists a completely dedicated, totally free, open source, smart donation service, based on Drupal itself and which even has a dedicated module enabling donating to and tracking for each module individually on the Drupal site itself?

If you don't understand the question, then I don't understand why drupal.org uses a 'dumb and isolated' paypal donation button. If you don't care about the question, you actually don't care about donations either? Thank you.

despite your attitude

bertboerland@ww... - March 6, 2005 - 21:19

mind to share what service that is running drupal you are talkiing about? btw: does it have as many users as paypal does?
--
groets
bertb

Donorge

kbahey - March 7, 2005 - 01:05

I agree with the attitude comment.

On the other hand, he is talking about Donorge.

The free module is described here and can be downloaded from here.

--
Consulting: 2bits.com
Personal: Baheyeldin.com

>does it have as many users

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 09:17

>does it have as many users as paypal does?

No, definitely not! It is a new donation network, not a transaction network like PayPal is. PayPal can be used in Donorge.

because....

silverwing - March 6, 2005 - 21:51

People who are most likely to donate to Drupal (or other sites, or buy things online) already have a paypal account. And people tend to trust paypal. And paypal handles problems with transactions that are processed through them.

silverwing

www.misguidedthoughts.com

you can donate with donorge

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 08:03

you can donate with donorge using paypal also and with more support, more payment options for Drupal donors

Do people need it?

Steven - March 6, 2005 - 22:22

Most of the people who donate to Drupal don't want anything in return: they like the program and wish to support it. Bounties and module-specific donations are different: people are paying for specific things they want.

Secondly, I don't recall you actually doing that much marketing about your service. How do you expect people to use it if you haven't proposed to tie it in to Drupal.org? You can't sit on the sidelines and expect us to do your marketing for you. You have to get people interested.

--
If you have a problem, please search before posting a question.

>Most of the people who

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 08:07

>Most of the people who donate to Drupal don't want anything in return: they like the program and wish to support it. Bounties and module-specific donations are different: people are paying for specific things they want.

Donorge is not about bounties!! Why do you think it is?

>Secondly, I don't recall you actually doing that much marketing about your service.

I have not much money! I have talked about integration once here without any reply, so that gave me the impression there was no single interest: http://drupal.org/node/17953

>You can't sit on the sidelines and expect us to do your marketing for you. You have to get people interested.

I do my best, sorry? Please don't think Donorge is about bounties.. perhaps this is also a good read: http://donorge.org/fosdem.htm and http://donorge.org/d_content/info_os

Vague texts

Steven - March 7, 2005 - 12:27

I thought donorge was about bounties, cos that's all I remember of it. You didn't even have a link in your post here, instead relying on people remembering your nickname, which is "drupal" in reverse (that alone is a reason for not trusting you, as you seem to prefer anonymity).

In any case, even after reading those pages, I'm still not in the clear.

"A free donation network" - What does tying in to a network offer me as a donor? What does it offer me as a project manager? And why should I want to centralize my processing through your site, which I may not trust? (these are all questions that you should answer). Starting your documentation from the point of view of the people rather than the features will massively improve your chances of sign-ups I think.

Furthermore, how does "a stand-alone service" mix with "donation network"? Where does the "network" come into play? Is it social? Is it like distributed authentication?

How does using donorge complicate the donation? Your description below just says "sign up for donorge" as one step, but you need to realize that /any/ hassle in the sign-up procedure is a huge barrier of entry. Signing up for a Drupal account is certainly not an effortless step now. Services like Paypal have had tons of usability research to make it easiest for new users to get started. You need to do the same: with social software, people are the key ingredient. Look to viral marketing techniques ("tell/invite a friend"), but only do this when the site is ready for average people to use. Otherwise you will only do more damage.

Finally, your writing style is quite hard to read. Try sticking to shorter sentences and try to stay to the point. Use diagrams, concrete examples, etc. You need to capture the attention of the reader in the first paragraph, or they lose interest.

PS: Your faq mentions fees, while your frontpage says there are none. When money is involved, you need to make sure /every/ single piece of information is correct, otherwise people will dismiss your site as a phishing scheme.

--
If you have a problem, please search before posting a question.

instead relying on people

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 13:03

>instead relying on people remembering your nickname, which is "drupal" in reverse (that alone is a reason for not trusting you, as you seem to prefer anonymity)

Now really, that is kind of ridiculous to say Steven, do I prefer anonymity?? I don't feel like having to plug Donorge with each single time my nick is mentioned so I chose lapurd. Why should I have to have my nick as Donorge? I prefer anonymity?? I prefer my own nickname :) that's all!

>"A free donation network" - What does tying in to a network offer me as a donor?
You can make more strategic donations, donate to several of your interests at once. Use one payment method, have not visit a couple of sites just in order to donate. You can see from how the network works (bottom-up) why organizations can be trusted to donate to. You can see instantly and very effectivly what other interest aer related to yours. The problem is presentation on Donorge, I fullhardly agree with you.

>What does it offer me as a project manager?
You can show your donors who you relate to, or auto donate to your relations. You allow donors to make it easier to donate to both your and related interests. It's free as in beer, it is about supporting _your_ interests trough the visibility of relations.

>And why should I want to centralize my processing through your site, which I may not trust?
Nobody is forcing you Steven. At some point someone is processing something for you, no way ever around that! It's open source and trying it's best to reflect trust by being transparent, you can trace each step. I really have no idea how any donation network could ever gain your trust if there is a paranoia inside someone about a system.

>Starting your documentation from the point of view of the people rather than the features will massively improve your chances of sign-ups I think.

Thanks for the hint. I really try hard and I have not much money so I have limeted time as well. I have done all this by myself so far, so I can only ask for understanding on that. I have many things to for Donorge and can only do 1 thing at a time, that's the problem so far, not functionality because it is all automated :)

>Furthermore, how does "a stand-alone service" mix with "donation network"? Where does the "network" come into play? Is it social? Is it like distributed authentication?

Stand alone service, imagine a single donations module, which has payment processing in itself and operates isolated everywhere, that is not a stand alone service, that is a module for making donations. Donorge is a stand alone donation service and it's added Drupal module is dedicated to work with this stand alone donation service.

Network, the network is largely relational. It is a relational donation network via the ability for items to verify each other and show how they relate. This builds trusts and insight and many things in relation to both donor and receiver interests. That is the network which is formed bottom-up, which promotes more insight and trust.

>How does using donorge complicate the donation?
In stead of making only a transaction, you end up at a donation basket where essentially you pay for items in the basket. It also offers more payment options for donors.

>Your description below just says "sign up for donorge" as one step, but you need to realize that /any/ hassle in the sign-up procedure is a huge barrier of entry. Signing up for a Drupal account is certainly not an effortless step now.

Oh I agree 100% with you. It's done really poor on Donorge! I want to update! I should note that you need not actually sign up for a Donorge account just in order to donate. It has advantages to sign up as a donor, like saving your baskets and tracking your history for example.

>Services like Paypal have had tons of usability research to make it easiest for new users to get started. You need to do the same: with social software, people are the key ingredient.

They have money, I don't. They have many users, I don't. So I do my best man, that's all I can do. I do appreciate your insight.

>Finally, your writing style is quite hard to read. Try sticking to shorter sentences and try to stay to the point.

Yes ;) English is not my native language and I am not very clear in English.

>PS: Your faq mentions fees, while your frontpage says there are none. When money is involved, you need to make sure /every/ single piece of information is correct, otherwise people will dismiss your site as a phishing scheme.

Corrected!

Now you misread me

Steven - March 7, 2005 - 20:11
instead relying on people remembering your nickname, which is "drupal" in reverse (that alone is a reason for not trusting you, as you seem to prefer anonymity)

Now really, that is kind of ridiculous to say Steven, do I prefer anonymity?? I don't feel like having to plug Donorge with each single time my nick is mentioned so I chose lapurd. Why should I have to have my nick as Donorge? I prefer anonymity?? I prefer my own nickname :) that's all!

What I meant is that you use a nickname which seems to be randomly picked for Drupal, rather than your real name. Using real names is essential in giving people a sign of trust. Trusting some random guy on the internet is hard enough already, so anything you can do to make people feel more comfortable would seem like a good idea.

If I sounded confrontational, it's because those questions were the ones I asked myself when I visited your site, and which I did not really get answered.

--
If you have a problem, please search before posting a question.

OK, cool Steven, I

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 21:13

OK, cool Steven, I understand :) I am going to take it easy with Donorge here, because as you can see, this thread is kind of silly. Perhaps I will change the nick to my real name, but then I loose all login info on other sites don't I? Anyway, I think I went over the top here a little as well. I really want Donorge to remain fun and this thread proves me that I should take take a few steps back. So really, I don't care what people think or will do, I want Donorge to stay at least fun to do (well at least reasonable fun), so really, I don't care what people want to use.

Hmmm...

STyL3 - June 3, 2008 - 20:55

You must have been right, as Donorge no long exits.

I looked at your site

media girl - March 6, 2005 - 23:40

In fact, I was one of the first who tried signing up a while back right after you posted the module. (I got a ways into the process before the system started telling me I could not name things this and that, without explaining why.)

Anyway, I opted not to try to use your module not because of technical issues with your site, but because:

1/ Nobody knows who you are, so trustworthiness becomes an issue for potential donors, and

2/ You do not seem to offer anything that PayPal does not offer directly, so

3/ When you take out additional fees, I would receive less money for the pleasure of having added a middleman to the donation process.

I agree with Steven in that you have not made very clear just what benefits your module offers. What is your fee schedule? What do admins get from your module that they don't get from PayPal directly or using the PayPal modules? What benefits do potential donors receive for donating through your module rather than via PayPal?

--
mediagirl.org

There are no fees

jasonwhat - March 7, 2005 - 01:41

Okay, I admit the guy is a bit frustrated. He spent over a year working on this thing and isn't having much luck getting others involved. The system still uses paypal to actually process the donations so there isn't a trust issue because donorge isn't keeping financial data.



Now the benefits are great, but won't be seen until more people are on Donorge. It is not an issue of people who donate getting "credit," the issue is allowing an at large community see how valued projects are. What it can do that Paypal can't is create a single place where all the projects on sourceforge receive donations and track them. It can allow larger products to automatically give to smaller projects they believe in. It also lets everybody beome a fundraiser for the projects they like, by starting their own fund. This type of approach was a great boost to spreading firefox and was used well by ActBlue.com during the election season.

I'm not surprised not many people are on Donorge because it hasn't really been markedted yet. More importantly, when people look and see just a few items they aren't likely to sign-up because most of us follow others. Donorge is in the Catch-22 of any new project, trust is measured by the number of users, but nobody will sign-up until the project is "trusted."

I see why Donorge is taking along time to launch, what I don't get is why every Drupal user, or at least anybody who cares about getting donations on the the open source, community zeitgeist isn't fully behind Donorge. And if something doesn't work, post a bug report. Provide feedback to improve the system. I don't see why donorge can't be the place people turn to for all donation processing. The framework to make it great is there, just the community is missing. But that is just 1 guys opinion...Oh yeah, and I told Casper nobody would use it with those fees, so he axed them. That simple. The only fees are those applied by Paypal, and I'm working with Casper to get support for merchant accounts so the fees will be less than Paypal.

Barrier to entry

Steven - March 7, 2005 - 02:45

I think Donorge can serve a purpose, but it is certainly not the same as a donation button that people can just click. As I said, many donors probably aren't interested in raising funds for specific things, so the way he lashes out at us having our own donations button is a bit rediculous. His site can complement direct donations, but I don't see why it should be the only way.

Furthermore, bounties and such were discussed at the developer sprint. You can find notes about this in the event book. If he thinks Donorge is a good way to do that, he should present it in a clear matter to everyone. Lashing out at Drupal.org like this is not the right way to go about this.

--
If you have a problem, please search before posting a question.

How is it harder than Paypal?

jasonwhat - March 7, 2005 - 04:50

I'm not sure how it is any harder than paypal. You put a button on your site, make it a donorge donation button or a paypal button leading to donorge, or your own button. They click the button and go to the site and donate. Others get to see how popular and trusted your module or product or whatever is, maybe even find other similar projects, and track all there giving in one place. If there was a difference, I'd say the benefits far outweigh it, however, I don't think going through donorge adds any additional steps.
Of course the tone is over the top and unecessary, but let's all lighten up a bit. I like to see a bit of passion and desparation in a developer now and then. :)


When he first announced this project months ago I was all over badgering him about it and trying to get it integrated with Drupal sites directly. I understand that marketing has been lacking, but I'm curious why nobody else has sought him out and wanted to get involved and see this adopted by the larger Drupal community. I guess I'm also wondering what other projects do different. Why did people suddenly think Flickr was a great place to put all their pics, etc.? Thanks.

Market

media girl - March 7, 2005 - 05:30

I can speak for myself. Donorge does not do anything I can already do with what I have. When I had a Blogger blog going, Flickr was a site that would host pictures. Not only that, I could post them by email, and I could even photoblog directly from email through Flickr to my blog. Flickr offered a service that I lacked -- and at that time, nobody else was doing that for Mac users. So there it is.

I don't understand what Donorge does beyond processing payments, and I have a system to do that. Not only that, but Donorge uses the same system, apparently, so I see no upside to going through Donorge, except that yet someone else is handling money during the transaction.

Now if I could save money -- which should not be that difficult, considering the apalling fees PayPal charges -- I would consider another system. In fact, once a project I'm working on is completed, I will just process donations myself through my own secure server. But again, I do not see the upside. (Please consider this an open invitation to explain the benefits in tangible terms.)
--
mediagirl.org

>I don't understand what

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 08:31

>I don't understand what Donorge does beyond processing payments, and I have a system to do that. Not only that, but Donorge uses the same system, apparently, so I see no upside to going through Donorge, except that yet someone else is handling money during the transaction.

In time Donorge can support more payment options, saving you administration. You think of donations only from your perspective, not in the broader sense that donors have interests beyond yours. Yes you can process donations on your site, but your donors want donating to be easy and consistent as well. They can also benefit from a network dedicated to developing this shared interest. Another thing is relations, do you have any other organization you support? Perhaps you want to auto donate percentages to them. You can show your donors how and why you relate to other and that way help donors as well. You could thus also help Drupal with this. A relational donation network can help anyone, it works from the bottom up. Your approach to donations lies isolated to your own site and only from the receivers perspective.

>In fact, once a project I'm working on is completed, I will just process donations myself through my own secure server.

Donorge could work to support outside processors as well. If you think of anything in relation to donations, Donorge can help you with this, because it is open source and dedicated to your interest in this.

True, a donorge button is

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 08:24

True, a donorge button is not the same as a simply transaction button. But then again, it is about making donations and not just transactions, there is a different background working here.

>so the way he lashes out at us having our own donations button is a bit rediculous

It is certainly not my intention to 'lash out'. I am only trying to explain things and was wondering something. It seems all kind of things are seen in my question and it basically sucks that is the case.

>Furthermore, bounties and such were discussed at the developer sprint. You can find notes about this in the event book. If he thinks Donorge is a good way to do that, he should present it in a clear matter to everyone.

Donorge is not about bounties, donations are about support: donations. Some people tell you explain things, other not to lash out. It is confusing me. I will try to do my best to communicate, but I don't always know when and where! It's also allot of work to do Donorge all by yourself, so that makes time another issue, I hope you understand.

it is simply because

adrian - March 7, 2005 - 02:47

It hasn't been properly explained. And no one has made a concerted effort to detail the benefits of this approach.

You can't just build something and expect people to flock to it. There was mention of donorge.org at drupalcon but the main reaction of the drupal developers was a shrug, because while they were aware of it's existence .. they weren't approached about it.

There have been a handful of posts about it on this site, and not a single one to any of the mailing lists or mention of it on irc. No one has decided not to use donorge, but the reverse is also true.

--
The future is so Bryght, I have to wear shades.

>It hasn't been properly

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 08:39

>It hasn't been properly explained. And no one has made a concerted effort to detail the benefits of this approach.

It's clear then a discussion needs to take place somehow, somewhere, because people now call me about a 'tone' where I have the best intentions, that's kind of painfull. At least there should be good talk I agree.

>There was mention of donorge.org at drupalcon but the main reaction of the drupal developers was a shrug, because while they were aware of it's existence .. they weren't approached about it.

I don't understand. Isn't it great a donation service is build also for Drupal's interest in donations? Look I don't know hardly anyone, how can I approach? I posted a few things and got hardly any reply so that makes it harder for me to understand where and how to talk.

>There have been a handful of posts about it on this site, and not a single one to any of the mailing lists or mention of it on irc. No one has decided not to use donorge, but the reverse is also true.

No problem about not using it! I am very busy with Donorge, I cannot help not having lengthy discussions, I am open to talk that's simple. I actually have posted some info about integration (http://drupal.org/node/17953) and a bit about Donorge here (http://donorge.org/fosdem.htm), I can't do more then that or I think I am a spammer. I am not a marketing talent, that's seems pretty obvious to me by now :)

Okay, fair enough

media girl - March 7, 2005 - 04:49

When I signed up, there were fees involved, unspecified fees to cover overhead. Nevertheless, I tried following through, but ran into a brick wall on the donorge website. I did report the problem there, and again when I was solicited by the developer directly by my website feedback form. I did not have a problem with the module's functionality as I never even got that far. I was just trying to set up an account on the donorge site.

Anyway....I am not a fan of PayPal by any stretch. If and when Donorge.org can offer merchant services outside of PayPal, for lesser fees than PayPal's (which seem to be going up every day), I'm all for it.

Until then, I use the service that the donors are familiar with and have accounts with. It's as simple as that. Until there's a reason to switch beyond "community zeitgeist" I will use what people know and trust (for better or worse).

This is not meant as criticism of Donorge, but as frank market feedback. That's all.
--
mediagirl.org

YOu are still using Paypal with Donorge.

jasonwhat - March 7, 2005 - 04:54

so there is no reason for your users to lose trust, or have worries. Payment processing happens on Paypal. Use a paypal button, but just link it to donorge. Oh, and did the problem get fixed?

1/ Nobody knows who you are,

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 08:18

1/ Nobody knows who you are, so trustworthiness becomes an issue for potential donors, and

I am Casper :) I have build Donorge for over a year hoping you understand donations are a shared interest that could also be developed transparently to allow it helping each and supporting each other become a dedicated project. I will not run with your money if that is your concern. Donorge is also registered company and to become an organization at some point, all in the transparent interest of donations. Trust is EXACTLY another reason why Donorge was started.

2/ You do not seem to offer anything that PayPal does not offer directly, so

Donorge is not a transaction network, but a donation network with it's own benefits. Donorge is also about the interest of your donors and yourself, PayPal cares about transactions, it was build for just that.

3/ When you take out additional fees, I would receive less money for the pleasure of having added a middleman to the donation process.

Donorge takes no more fee :)

>I agree with Steven in that you have not made very clear just what benefits your module offers.

For now this module offers donation tracking for you on your site.

>What do admins get from your module that they don't get from PayPal directly or using the PayPal modules?

Think also about your donors. Your donors have interests beyond the mediagirl site. Donorge acts as a network to be dedicated to any interests as well, this is also in your own interest. So a donation module can help connect you with those interests as well, besides offering tracking without any maintenence. A paypal button isolates donating actions and interest to your site only, perhaps you want to help others and your donors as well. Donorge is a good platform for this.

>What benefits do potential donors receive for donating through your module rather than via PayPal?

They are given a change to break away from the paypal only mentality. As Donorge grows, it will also offer payment abilities. Some people complain about having to donate via paypal. And any payment Donorge supports, benefits in turn those who apply Donorge.

Your tone is not useful for

Boris Mann - March 7, 2005 - 02:55

Your tone is not useful for someone trying to promote a product.

You need to continue to market and convince people to use your system, not complain. We did put using Donorge.org on a list to be discussed, and I'm sure we'll have more to discuss with you.

Well, I was just wondering

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 08:44

Well, I was just wondering what the benefits are of using a paypal button, just the same as someone can question why to use a donorge button. If people see a tone in it...heh.. well I am just trying to communicate somehow because I got no other response on my suggestion on integration on the forum. I am not complaining in any way, I just was convinced there was no interest and was curious to understand what the paypal was offering that was smarter. Thanks for discussing it so far, although with a horribly bad start I guess. I'm doing my best.

Oh this is not good! Heh,

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 08:02

Oh this is not good! Heh, ok, this seems a bad start! Please hear me out. I worked on Donorge by myself for a very long time with passion. I want to HELP Drupal and pretty much any donor and receiver interest. I am not a great communicator or marketing guy. I certainly did not want to post all kind of posts about Donorge on Drupal to come across as a Spam! I will admit to have been wrong in thinking the system would prove itself - I worked on Donorge alone for so long that the English etc. on the site lacking and English is not my strongest point. The point is that many think of Donorge as simply another donation service, well to some degree it is, but there is more to it!

We can help each other with donations, because we all have shared interests in them! That is exactly why Donorge was created! Many here seem to follow the isolated approach per site, which is old thinking to me. If you can show relations between interests, you have a better donation network in where both you and your donors can form donation strategies. It is NOT about bounties, only about supportive donations. If you allow donors more strategic donations and options via one site, you help both the donor and receiver. The point is that a paypal button on drupal.org is an isolated money transaction button and nothing more. A dedicated donation button adds more payment options and adds intelligence behind the network and even dedicated integration and it offers relational organization data around which trust and insight can be formed.

Any open source software can benefit if donors can see project relations and have a more central place to make their donation versus having to go trough donation steps per each site in isolation.

I have the best intentions, look at Donorge simply as a shared interest in donations. It even makes it safer to donate even, because you can see organization relations. Donorge is open source, if it lacks, you can offer suggestions. I am not begging in any way, I was truly just curious to see the points for using only a PayPal button so I can respond, not my intention to have an 'tone'. I am all for helping Drupal with donations.

Suggestion

media girl - March 8, 2005 - 06:59

You need a big hookup to get this rolling. I suggest that you talk to the folks over at CivicSpace. The code is the same as 4.5 Drupal right now, so your module side of the whole project should work without adjustments.

And their entire focus is on nonprofit community building. They might be a more natural alliance to seek out. If you can convince them to include your module in their core, then you've found not an insignificant endorsement.

Just an idea.

--
mediagirl.org

Hi mediagirl, Actually I

lapurd - March 8, 2005 - 07:59

Actually I already did exactly that :) Yes, it's a great idea to add to Civicspace modules I agree with you and some over there agree as well. But so far I have understood Civicspace, "Donorge is not a silver bullet" as well, so I really don't understand where they are going or want to go to. Well, I wish them all the luck with their donation button quest.

I think the general idea is and should be: the Donorge usability is not good at the moment. The English is hard to read and there is no marketing. People just don't dig it at the moment. That really makes it almost impossible to present it to a larger user base it seems, at least to me. Besides this, I am in rather financial bad times to put it lightly, so Donorge can only take so much of my time as long as it does not become financially interesting itself. Thanks for idea.

People like isolated donations

jasonwhat - March 8, 2005 - 17:28

http://civicspacelabs.org/node/view/6457
you can read the discussion there, but my sense is most nonprofits think it is beneficial to keep donations isolated and separate. If you handle donations in a way that makes it easier for potential supporters to find similar organziations, you risk losing them to those organizations. Most nonprofits want to keep their donors to themselves and control all that data, building loyalty and making appeals. They don't want a user controlled environment. And many don't want transparency, they want to serve up controlled information to users- MoveOn.org is the king of this. Plus, what if you have $0.00 in donations- you don't want people to see that. I disagree with all this, and this isn't what everyone in that thread was saying, but the general idea is that CivicSpace wants their own per site solution, rather than fully integrating donorge.

I should note here that

lapurd - March 8, 2005 - 19:26

I should note here that organizations do have the option to hide their donation history info, the choice is available for them.

Current donations.module, Donorge at FOSDEM

Dries - March 7, 2005 - 08:36

I wrote the current donations.module in only a couple hours. It is about 250 lines of PHP code built on top of Drupal. (Read: your first argument is moot.)

That said, we talked about using Donorge at FOSDEM. They gave me your hand outs which I read on the way back to Antwerp. We are still undecided about using Donorge. Frankly, posts like this aren't exactly encouraging (the hand outs, however, are).

The reason we are undecided is because we believe that project specific donations are not very managable. The reason is twofold:

  1. It leaves many people in the cold because only some contributors maintain a project. Some of us felt that a per-user Paypal button would be more fair (eg. towards those providing support in the forums, those maintaining the handbook or those who don't have a CVS account).
  2. Furthermore, if, say, people contributed 200 euro to the image module project, who does the money flow to and who decides what to do with it? The project has a long history of different maintainers, and various regular contributors. Using per-user donations, this would be a non-issue.

Dries,

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 09:09

Dries, I am really sorry that my post is getting this kind of response. I humbly, humbly invite you to understand the deeper points to this. First impressions count eh? Well this surely makes me really depressed then.

Your module works, but it works inside drupal.org only (there is no network connecting the interest of donations outside of it). Donorge is more then just processing the donations. It is a network onto itself which can align interests of donations beyond just Drupal alone. Any open source project can benefit from this, because it is a relational donation network which in turn helps donors gain trust for charity organizations as well. It helps to help each other when it goes about helping each other. I am not some kind of huge company, Donorge is free even and a hard time for me personaly so far. Donorge was constructed out of the pure need for a dedicated donation solution. It has taken me allot of time and hardship to get this far at all (not that matters I should say), all I want to demonstrate is the pure reason of Donorge: to help support each other, Donorge can develop this as a shared interest beyond Drupal alone. Look, your module works, but it still isolates donation abilities to Drupal alone. Donorge crosses the bridge and simply connects it's module to a larger and more dedicated open source giving network. This is actually a unique chance, I have been thinking about many aspecta of it and people who are only just learning about it miss many points and that is hard for me to communicate. It is because it is NEW and no other giving network like it exhists, please understand that! There is also no channel of communication and it all seems to work on assumptions so far. That makes it even harder for me by myself. Donorge would have never ever even existed if it did not want to utterly support Drupal in the first place. Donations are the most fundamental shared way of supporting any organization and all Donorge is dedicated to is developing that interest. I am terribly worried about the impression you got so far, because it totally is not the nature of myself, please read my responces on this page. Somehow I want to get a line of communication which will work, Adrian suggested posting to the developer mailing list, should I go there then? I have hardly any money myself actually and still I work on a freaking donation network for more then a year, please understand thus that my intention is pure and it goes beyond Drupal alone. Drupal can make an impression for itself here as well!

What does it buy us? Donorge

Dries - March 7, 2005 - 09:26

*** Lapurd wrote:
Donorge crosses the bridge and simply connects it's module to a larger and more dedicated open source giving network.

For many of us, Drupal development is about giving away and helping each other. We spent many hours, days, weeks, months, even years, giving away.

I think you should change your marketing focus from "What is donorge?" to "What does it buy us?". (Hint: the answer should be more resources and motivated contributors.)

>For many of us, Drupal

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 11:00

>For many of us, Drupal development is about giving away and helping each other. We spent many hours, days, weeks, months, even years, giving away.

Yes and that's great! Some people want to _give Drupal money_ for it :) That's what donations do, support your giving by giving something else in turn. That's my point with Donorge as well actually Dries. Donorge can help Drupal by donating percentages it receives to Drupal as well! It can help by showing another relation to Drupal as there are many and donors should know!

>I think you should change your marketing focus from "What is donorge?" to "What does it buy us?". (Hint: the answer should be more resources and motivated contributors.)

It's funny you mention marketing, because I haven't applied any yet :) That's the point, there is no marketing and people seem to pick any random bits they can. I have pretty much only been coding so far. Marketing, I know hardly anything about it at this moment.

I think you will be interested to know that Donorge has been just offered a free column in the http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/ magazine. I am about to plug Drupal there and you know why? Because Donorge *IS* about giving and helping each other. The point is that if Drupal uses Donorge for donations, the relations begin to matter on a _donations_ level. A giving network allows more abilities for support, also by percentages or the mere showing of relations. Donorge wants to show relations to Drupal for example, because it depends on them and wants to see them supported as well, that is the nature of a relational giving network. It's not just about giving code and documentation, donations are more general and not yet recognized as a shared interest by many open source projects. There is an unused strategy or smart system waiting to go on-line when it comes to donations. Donorge will simply plug Drupal because it is _related_ to Drupal, it is natural to do and support each other this way, that is the strong point of a relational giving network, you help both the donor and receiver this way. The problem for Donorge is marketing and communicating, you recognize that clearly ;)

I am glad I can respond to

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 09:14

I am glad I can respond to your points :)

1. True. I get the problem. So, the solution is donating to users. Donorge can track donations for anyone or thing, it won't matter if an item is a project or a user. So for users, people can make an item on Donorge and call it 'Dries' or 'Casper' and donate to that. This can be tracked perfectly the same still with the module, since it still is an item from Donorge it's point of view.
2. That is more or less the same as point 1, you would have to be able to donate to users as I explained is actually perfectly possible.

I am with Mediagirl on

Hiveminds - March 7, 2005 - 10:26

I am with Mediagirl on this,

I keep trying to figure out what Donorge is and I keep getting stuck. I read the whole thread and I only got confused.

Can you give a flowchart comparison of the normal donation process via Paypal and what happens when Donorge becomes involved? I need to see a few blocks of the benefits of using such a system. Both as as donator and as a recipient. Please no marketing speak just clear step by step so I get it.

If you can give a clear enough explaination then I'll make up a diagram and post it.
---------------------------
www.hivemindz.com (running PHP5)
www.fireorb.org (documentation and hacks)
__________________________
Carl McDade
Information Technology Consult
Team Macromedia

>Can you give a flowchart

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 10:41

>Can you give a flowchart comparison of the normal donation process via Paypal and what happens when Donorge becomes involved?

OK! :) No marketing speak, well I do my best. User clicks on a donation button and gets on Donorge (or on the item page, that is up to the item to set), donor completes payments steps there, chooses payment method, donation finished. In case the item donates percentages, a donation will have been made to 2 or more items at once (visibly), and in case the donor wants to donate to more then 1 item each month, he/she can use saved donation baskets for this. When the user was logged into Donorge, he/she can save baskets with all donation, item and payment details in them. Donors can also donate anonymously if wanted and still trace his/her own donation history.

Another example relating to yourself:
You might have an item on Donorge called: hivemindz. You indicate to relate to or be friend of Drupal. Donors now know how they can also indirectly support you. OR you can set hivemindz to auto donate a percentage to Drupal or more things related to your interests. This is in your interests as well as that of the the donors because they what the support you and that does not always mean supporting you directly only.

But more is gained from this? Trust!
"You do not relate to this and that? Then how do you explain telling me this and that? Why should I (continue to) support your organization or your interest? I do not see how your interests relate to others interests, it seems in actuality you are isolated while you tell me all kind of things. Based on that I favor to support the other organization with my donations. That other organization is transparent about it's interests and relations. In addition it shows that by supporting them I also indirectly support some other directly related interest and another, this is visibly shown to be close to my initial interests. Your organization no longer interests me, because _you isolate_. I have discovered that in reality, your mission or organization _is isolated_."

A charity can tell you all kind of things and act in your interests, but where are the relations showing this? Donorge stimulates transparency and showing relations around interests.

Now you might have another item called fireorb. Fireorb can also indicate to depend on Drupal and be friends of hivemindz. It all helps in perspective of both yourself and the donor. Drupal in turn gets more and more relations to itself and in turn donors get a better and better picture about their interests. It all works transparently and bottom-up.

So for the donating steps themselves not much per-se is different, the difference lies in the network behind it. A donation network IS NOT a transaction network only, Donorge thinks it should not be! You can in turn always mail your donors or those interested in you. You can set donation goals, you can see what organizations are hard to trust, basically these current features: http://donorge.org/d_content/features

Okay,

Hiveminds - March 7, 2005 - 11:10

Okay,

Got that. I my case though I am thinking of it from a users point:

                                         Xoops  = 30%
                                         Drupal  = 30%
                                         Xaraya = 10%         
               No -> pool to $200 then  Mambo = 30%                     
Pay direct?  <
              yes -> Mambo = 30%
                     Xoops  = 30%
                     Drupal  = 30%
                     Xaraya = 10%

And there is a minimum set for a pool? Is this a correct assesment?

If so then I see why you have a problem in getting the word out. I think that the user base has to force the recipients to join even if they don't see the benefits.

I would recommend creating some polling accounts for projects that are not members. Say for example I am making a donation to project1, project2 and project3 I should be asked if there is a project not listed that I would like to donate part of the funds to. When I choose project4, the non-member,then they get a virtual account which emails out a anouncement to them of how much they could have recieved if they were a member of Donorge.

Now that you have that set up then you should concentrate your marketing efforts on getting users. A slogan like "the easiest way to share your support" directing the user to be more diversified in thier giving would do wonders I think.

---------------------------
www.hivemindz.com (running PHP5)
www.fireorb.org (documentation and hacks)
__________________________
Carl McDade
Information Technology Consult
Team Macromedia

The pools in Donore are

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 12:00

The pools in Donorge are nothing more then dumb collecting buckets actualy. The 'intelligence' is build only in the baskets. The minimum limit for these pools is so that Donorge only empties pools after a given timeframe or when a given donation amount was reached.

You can even safely test these percentages on the Donorge site at http://testing.donorge.org using a Drupal ID

It works like this, item Donorge can optionally set itself to donate:
10% to Drupal
12% to Xaraya
78% to Donorge

User donates to Donorge and sees only Donorge in the basket and the percentages to the other items. So the donors sets one amount. At the last step, the preview donation step, the user would see (in this case) 3 items in the donation preview with each the correct amount. Now when the donation is made Donorge simply sees it as a donation to 3 items as the basket has become holding 3 items in it. However, Donorge saves the basket for re-use as the one with 1 item, so if you change percentages, the user with your item is not stuck to old percentages. There are many details in Donorge already..and I have a hard time communicating it all in easy to digest sentences, but I will do my best.

>I would recommend creating some polling accounts for projects that are not members. Say for example I am making a donation to project1, project2 and project3 I should be asked if there is a project not listed that I would like to donate part of the funds to. When I choose project4, the non-member,then they get a virtual account which emails out a anouncement to them of how much they could have recieved if they were a member of Donorge.

Wonderfull suggestion! Thank you very much :)

Example

Dries - March 7, 2005 - 16:41

Say I had to buy a Powerbook to replace my aging development machine , I could associate myself with the Drupal project on donorge.org hoping people would donate me a buck or two? (hint, hint) Who moderates or controls that? How about people trying to impersonate a project or individual?

I played with http://testing.donorge.org/ for a bit but got somewhat confused. It takes quite a bit of time/effort to grasp Donorge. I wouldn't call it 'transparent' ... yet. Things like Who regards '$project' as a friend? are really vague to me. What does it mean to be a project's friend? Why aren't people who donate to $project friends?

I'm still in favor of (optional) per-user Paypal buttons, I think.

they are friends

jasonwhat - March 7, 2005 - 18:36

People who donate to a project are friends automatically. Casper is getting help with the interface from some Pros so it will be more "transparent." On any open system, including Paypal or Ebay there exist a possiblity of fraud. I mean I've known plenty of people to create a fake login to up the price of a product they are selling. Charitable organizations will be verified by phone and proof of financial records, of course all of this can be faked, even when using a 1,000 dollar for setup payment system. What is to stop me posing as you and putting up a paypal button for your laptop, even right in this forum right now? I just get a hotmail address with Dries in it somewhere and off I go.

>What is to stop me posing

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 19:08

>What is to stop me posing as you and putting up a paypal button for your laptop, even right in this forum right now? I just get a hotmail address with Dries in it somewhere and off I go.

That was why the verification page on Donore was created as you know :) We all know we can verify Dries created the Drupal item on Donorge, he can indicate it on Drupal itself, link the verify info to his mail address. But with a donorge donation button on the Drupal site itself, it automatically will link so you can verify it that way easily. Also, projects 'close' to each other are likely to verify and help each other over this trust issue as well. No relations mean isolation.

Very good question. So how

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 18:50

Very good question. So how do you associate yourself with Drupal on Donorge? You can't unless Drupal indicates you are a friend in the first place. Only items can have relations such as friends (other items). A donor is only a donor having no relations of any kind.

Anyone can create an item and call it Dries or Drupal, but who verifies that? Items verify each other. No verification means isolation. No friends means you are not related. If you create an item called Drupal, then Donorge, moduleX or another item verifies Drupal to be have been created by you. That's how a bottom-up relational network works. It works around local interests, bottom-up.

Do I regard giveorange.org a friend? Yes. So I indicate that from Donorge and in turn giveorange gains more trust. I actually verified it was created by giveorange as well and donors can see this. In turn I would like to indicate Donorge depends on Drupal and donate percentages to Drupal, just as other would like to. I would also like my donors to know that if they support Drupal, they help Donorge also. Now imagine Jo Smo signing up calling himself the Apache project. Do you think that project will have any friends or verifiers? Jo Smo is going nowhere.

Stretch this to charities and Donorge can change on-line donations in a transparent way which I suspect many people would rather not see happening: bottom-up control of donation money.

Now about your wishlist. With an item called Drupal, you could create additional goals which show up on the main item page. Call the goal Dries Powerbook. Now you can collect donations and track everything and have all the same item features (percenateges, mail, messages, tracking) for the Powerbook goal as well. It acts as a sub-item and shows to donors as an additional goal. I created Donorge on a p3-500Mhz btw, I could use some new hardware as well....so ..erm...nevermind :)

Funny

Dries - March 7, 2005 - 21:35

Funny, I'm using a Pentium III 500Mhz as well.

And replying to myself

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 13:26

And replying to myself here:

>If you don't understand the question, then I don't understand why drupal.org uses a 'dumb and isolated' paypal donation button.

I think people read this as an insult or something? I was purely talking about the technicality of it. The button is isolated, it's just a transaction button, there is no smart network developed behind it relating purely to donations (paypal is about transactions). That was my intention of the word 'dumb', this has now been horribly misread I clearly see :(

HOLY stinking Crap!

jasonwhat - March 7, 2005 - 16:00

This thread has gotten CRazy! I know his initial post had additude (of course he is Dutch and they are a Wiley bunch), but I never imagined a guy would have so much trouble trying to help people get donations. It is funny to see a forum post, "I pay you 100$ for 1 Feature," as I type, knowing that this is exactly the type of place Donorge would be great. I'm saddened to see all the flak one guy gets- I mean saying that he is trying to "hide" his identity and can't be trusted. Yes, yes, his original post was confrontational, but it shouldn't be this hard to try and help people. The guy is begging for people to let him help and just getting a bunch of "what's in it for me."

So here is why I'm such a strong supporter. I've worked in nonprofit world for the past decade and seen the invisible competition that so often destroys work: Fighting for donors and dollars. The common thinking is, "You get donors by being the only one providing a service, if you partner with someone, then people know they provide the service and might donaote to them." Systems like Donorge challenge this thinking and give an actual mechanism to change it. It sets up a real community where the more donations MediaGirl recieves, the more Drupal will recieve- either directly or indirectly. Imagine if every Drupal site that collects donations used Donorge and donated just 2% back to Drupal automatically. That could add up fast. What if every SpreadFirefox affiliate put a "support Firefox" button in their emails? Spreadfirefox is built on CivicSpace which is built on Drupal- donating through Donorge, which is also built on Drupal. Hey, they are all connected, and on Donorge every user can see that. Does Paypal do that? Saying that Donorge is no different or better than PayPal is really missing the power of it. It is like saying Ebay is just a PayPal "Middleman."
Why I really love the idea of Donorge is because it is Open Source giving. You don't trust the items on there because they are backed by the Tides Foundation or United Way, you trust them because the community verifies them, and that means anybody can be involved. It means that little charity trying to raise $62.00 so Tsuanami orphans can eat for a month, doesn't have to wait until UNICEF processes their grant application-espeically since the Good Samaritan running the orphanage doesn't know what UNICEF is, but someone who is a Drupal/Donorge user and was on vacation when the tsunami struck does. But enough of my droning...Let's give him more crap for his poor English and bad user interface.

Ran out of room...I'm on a tear

jasonwhat - March 7, 2005 - 16:07

(continued)...Why I really love the idea of Donorge is because it is Open Source giving. You don't trust the items on there because they are backed by the Tides Foundation or United Way, you trust them because the community verifies them, and that means anybody can be involved. It means that little charity trying to raise $62.00 so Tsuanami orphans can eat for a month, doesn't have to wait until UNICEF processes their grant application-espeically since the Good Samaritan running the orphanage doesn't know what UNICEF is, but someone who is a Drupal/Donorge user and was on vacation when the tsunami struck knows about Donorge, finds an internet connection, creates the item on Donorge and raises enough to feed them for 4 months, in one day. And maybe Dries was the guy on a much needed vacation, so he gets all Drupal users to donate 1%....Oh, enough of my droning...Let's just give Casper (the anonymous lapurd) more crap for his poor English, thorny attitude, and bad user interface.

Potential

Aran Deltac - March 7, 2005 - 16:18

I agree that donorge has a lot of potential. But, wow, lapurd is an a*s. He really needs to learn how to communicate with people without insulting them. Its totally unprofessional. Being dutch is no excuse. I regretfully offered him free hosting on my server, but now I'm totally up in the air. I don't like the guy, but I like the idea. *sigh*

http://www.electroniclife.org/node/16

--
http://www.electroniclife.org/

Lapurd did not meant to

Dries - March 7, 2005 - 16:27

Lapurd did not meant to insult anyone so let's get back to discussing the real issues here. :)

Yes and the real issue is:

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 17:03

>Lapurd did not meant to insult anyone so let's get back to discussing the real issues here. :)

Yes, the worldwide Drupal promotion cause, which is fairly nice. A new open source relational donation network based on YOUR Drupal people, focused on all our shared interests in donations.

Look, I think it all started with the 'dumb button' comment which was targeted at a paypal button not having any dedicated donation network behind it: a technical description of a dumb button. Now this has not worked very well I see. Some people seem now to prefer calling me evil lapurd I think, which is fine I guess, it sure stings my heart deeply, please realize just that. I have dedicated great parts of my life and had to sacrifice many things to be able to create Donorge. People can complain all they want about marketing, but can only do things step by step. I guess I now am an a** around here?! It stings my heart to be called an a** here, but I think I prefer to stick with Dries advice, stick to the issues. Let's do that, help each other, that is the issue here. How can we help each other, that is why I created Donorge, not to be called an a**!! Apologies for sounding so dramatic.

You seem a great

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 17:24

Do you realize you are a great inspirational communicator yourself by calling people an a*s. http://www.electroniclife.org/node/80

Yep

Aran Deltac - March 7, 2005 - 17:35

Ya, you're right, sorry. A bit fed up with the attitude, and I know, Dries, you are right. I'm keeping my mouth shut now. :)

--
http://www.electroniclife.org/

Just re-read the original post...

jasonwhat - March 7, 2005 - 18:50

...and I can't believe it. How did everyone suddenly get so sensitive? I see the "dumb" button comment which he apolegitically explains, and a terse sentence about how there is something off if you don't "get it," but nothing to get this kind of reaction. This thread is just hilarious, it is like a crazy Seinfeld episode. Trying to help get more donations for everybody, What an A%S! Not having good marketing and networking skills, F#ck him. Who needs him anyways. I mean Paypal made that sweet donation button, they are quite altruistic. I'm just screwing around. It's gotta be noon somewhere in the world, I'm going for a beer.

oh, and I'll pay for that beer and many more with the money Casper and I steal from Donorge-that's why I'm coming to his defense...oops, certainly shouldn't said that :)

haha

tulula - March 7, 2005 - 19:11

K, first time into this thread just because I wanted to see what "question about the paypal button on drupal.org" active forum topic was about...and I have to say, THANK YOU for the entertainment!

Unbelievable!

Let's see, things NOT to talk about - Religion, Politics, Sex &, ummmmm, MONEY!?!?!

beer

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 19:30

At least beer is mentioned in this thread, beer is good.

IF Drupal filtered MSN emoticons...

tulula - March 7, 2005 - 19:57

(b) is good! AND no discussion is ever unbalanced with the presence of (b) ...wherefore art thou (b)?

;)

Have you accepted Jesus as your Lord and Savior?

jasonwhat - March 7, 2005 - 19:48

Bush as your pious leader? Donorge as your Holy Grail of donations? If not burn--oh yes, are you afraid? You will be...you will be.

P.S. and as Austin Powers Farger says, the Dutch are "Freaky Deeky." Go sand your wooden shoes and run your computer with Windmill oh anonymous Lapurd.

Beer is on me

lapurd - March 7, 2005 - 21:21

OK I want Donorge to remain fun to do, so this thread is clearly showing me to back off. I do want to help, but there is a limit :) This has to remain fun for me to do as well. I am sure we can agree on the fun part, it has to remain fun. So, beers are on me and use your paypal button or whatever, I really don't care! Help yourself :)

Some advice

kbahey - March 7, 2005 - 21:30

lapurd

Reading the new comments in this thread, here are things that I think you need to get done:

1. You need marketing. PERIOD! It is all well and good to have a good product or service, but it is not enough. Look at how marketing has helped FireFox for example.

2. You need to be more articulate about what Donorge is and what it is not. Start with a one page overview. The elevator story. Something you can tell someone in an elevator in 15 seconds or less. Then develop some scenarios where the donorge service would be unique, and offer more than what Paypal and other commerical services have. Put all this on Donorge.org.

3. I know that writing documentation and marketing is not the forte of geeks who design software and write code. So, this means that you have to get someone else to do this part.

4. Do not be discouraged by the reactions in this thread. Take that as a learning experience. As a Dutch writing in English to an audience who may or maynot be English speaking it is hard, but there is room for improvement in the future. You can see that the discussion has become cheerful in mood towards the end, so that is a good sign.

--
Consulting: 2bits.com
Personal: Baheyeldin.com

 
 

Drupal is a registered trademark of Dries Buytaert.