Closed (duplicate)
Project:
Field Group
Version:
7.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
22 Dec 2012 at 17:07 UTC
Updated:
13 Mar 2014 at 21:38 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
swentel commentedThis has been in the queue for a couple of times now. DS preprocess fields have exactly this limit re: templates, there's nothing I can do about that. I'll check the weight problem.
Comment #2
playfulwolf commentedif talking about weight there is also the same problem with "Links" field on the node - it does not respect appear in fixed position in current nest (group).
Comment #3
swentel commentedAre you using field group ?
Comment #4
playfulwolf commentedYes. Mainly because of ease of adding and other html5 attributes
To overcom ("Links") weight problem it is he best to add it alone to some field group - it does respect field nesting
p.s. seems I use dev version - 7.x-2.x-dev of Field group :/
Comment #5
swentel commentedhmm yeah, 7.x-2.x is not supported anymore iirc, let's move this over there
Comment #6
playfulwolf commentedOk, I've downgraded to 1.x - haven't read all the documentation. Links weight problem persists.
Comment #7
playfulwolf commentedCan confirm the same with Field Group 1.x
Comment #8
tim.plunkettJust had this problem as well.
Comment #9
tim.plunkettfield_group_build_pre_render()callsfield_group_fields_nest(), which handles moving the fields into their respective groups.Except, #pre_render is before render, which is when the preprocess layer happens, and
template_preprocess_comment()is where the author field is added.I'm having the same problem with the permalink, which is added in the same place in preprocess.
This still might be a DS bug, in the sense that it is only possible to add those fields when using DS, and it might be neatly solved on the DS end, but I'll have to debug more.
I'm also curious to see if this happens with node elements, and if not, how that is handled.
Comment #10
nils.destoop commentedMarking this as duplicate of #2049291: Wrong order of the fields