top level heirarchy + other minor bugs

Yes, all this issues are correct.

Regarding to the number 1, I imagine that you can create a top parent term, and then all the previous top items will be straight inline, not indented. But, anyway, this is just a bad solution.

I have another small issue:

In the settings of a tinytax block, inside Block specific settings, you can find a "Term" textarea (Enter the term (e.g. Taxon Name) to which the taxonomy will be exposed to by default. THIS FIELD WILL AUTOCOMPLETE).
Ok, it autocompletes but it suggest terms from OTHER VOCABULARIES, not just the one that you are modifing (you enter to this settings page through a specific vocabulary-block).
It's a bug, even if you can select a term from the vocabulary and ignore the others.

Thank you for this module, it's perfect if you have a large taxonomy!

Bye,

ferran

Ups! I changed the issue title with my other post.
I modify it again according to the author...
bye
ferran

1. When I drill down I get sub-terms under it's parent in a straight line, as it should be.

But when I am at the top level of a vocab, the lines on the left incrementally indent for each main term, though they are on the same 'level' - they are not subterms of one another.

I'm not sure if I fully understand the problem here. Is there any chance you can link to the site in question, or even send me a copy of the taxonomy.

2. I can find no way to go back up a hierarchy.

Click on the name above. Have you tried the demo site?

3.Vocabs without any terms are picking up terms from vocabs that do have terms.

4 Vocabs with only one term are not always showing up.

Definite bugs here. I'll look into these.

5 Interference with other blocks - moving them spontaneously.

There is an issue that blocks can get changed when multiple tinytax blocks are on a site. I'll hopefully have a fix for this soon.

Simon, I already tried your "new release".

As we never replied to your query in here (I'm not sure if I fully understand the problem here. Is there any chance you can link to the site in question, or even send me a copy of the taxonomy.), I'll attach an screenshot of what we mean. Will be the best.

As you can see, the orders should be listed as the families (in the second block), so it's just the first level that's not working properly. Notice that I have all the orders to the root of the taxonomy/vocabulary. Probably, if I create another term as a common parent of all those, the display of the orders will be correct again.

I imagine it's something easy to solve.

best wishes!

The issue here, is that the Taxonomy in use must have only one term which doesn't have a parent. In your case, all your families have parent set as "root", i.e. they have no parent. You must instead set a parent for all of them, which will fix this problem.

I will probably make a release which handles this problem.

Simon

Cool.
I did it like this, because when using the Taxonomy Menu module, that creates a menu for each taxonomy you have, already adds the vocabulary name as a parent. So, in my menu, I see the vocabulary name, and once I expand it, I see all the terms that have no parent. If I add a commont parent to all that terms, I should expand "twice" my menu to get some real result.
I'll keep an eye to your module.
Thanks & regards.

This issue should be fixed with the 1.4 version.

Please try this and post back if you still have any issues.

Thanks!
Now it's more useful for me.

I have a small problem now. IN top of all my terms, I have the vocabulary name "IBC". If I click on IBC, the structure resets (that's the desired functionality), but if I click to the + , I get a Page not found.
Maybe an option to disable the + in the vocabulary name...?

I like the URLs that your module produces. In my case, something like http://localhost/struthioniformes/struthionidae-ostrich for example.
I just want to ask one more question: I was using Taxonomy redirect to redirect my "species term page" to the "species node page" (I hope you understand me). But, for that, I needed the URL like http://localhost/struthionidae-ostrich , that means, just with the last term. This is not possible, by design? I imagine it's not possible, because you should keep that for the hierarchy and the breadcrumb...

Thanks Simon, I'll use this module as all other modules that create Menus and so on, get stuck when the taxonomy is laaarge....