Just curious - is there any way to specify which taxonomies TAC is aware of?

I have many large taxonomies, but I need to use TAC on about 3. It would be great (and simplify the admin pages) if I could under admin somewhere have a list of all taxonomies, each with a checkbox that i could then say "TAC aware" for only those which were for TAC usage.

If I've missed this, then please point out where I should be looking - otherwise - feel free to treat this as a feature request :)

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#2 TAC.png11.25 KBchrissearle

Comments

klance’s picture

On the TAC admin page, you can make TAC aware of categories by selecting a role, then adding the category to the role and setting its permissions for that role. The "Global" permission applies to all categories that belong to vocabularies that aren't on the list. The "default" permission for a vocabulary that is on the list, applies to all categories within that vocabulary that aren't on the list. In other words, TAC is only aware of what you need to control, and anything else is addressed by the "Global" permission for a particular role, which is usually "ignore" across the board. Making TAC "aware" of a vocabulary without specifying its permissions for at least anonymous users isn't really that useful IMHO.

chrissearle’s picture

StatusFileSize
new11.25 KB

See attached screenshot - am I looking in the wrong place ?

klance’s picture

Uh... wow, you got me. Now I'm wondering if the options were still under Admin->Access Control in a tab called Category Permissions when I was running version 5.x-1-1. I didn't think so, but they could have been. That's the only other place I've ever seen the settings for TAC. The attached page looks very familiar for some reason, so at one time I had it on my site, too, but was still able to adjust the settings.

chrissearle’s picture

Nope - nothing there. Wonder if the settings are only in 5.x-1.x or 5.x-2.x dev builds?

thomasmurphy’s picture

subscribing

cpugeniusmv’s picture

This sounds a lot like the new UI in the 5.x-2.x-dev branch. What do you all think?

cpugeniusmv’s picture

Status: Active » Closed (fixed)

Please reopen if this is still an issue. Thanks.