Active
Project:
Drupal core
Version:
main
Component:
field system
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
14 Mar 2013 at 14:14 UTC
Updated:
16 Sep 2019 at 23:26 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
dave reidComment #2
Niklas Fiekas commentedSome considerations:
Comment #3
andypostMaybe better to implement some API to allow contrib easily ship custom set of patterns
Comment #4
dave reidI think that would be an ok solution. We can ship with internal support for patterns for the relevant widgets, but not expose them in the UI.
Comment #8
zaporylieIs this issue still valid? Client-side validation would probably improve usability so tagging it for usability review.
Comment #9
zaporylieAdding dev days tag
Comment #10
zaporylieMy conclusion after some research I did to this issue:
- Added "Needs usability review" as client-side validation could improve Field API usability.
- No activity in 4 years so removing assignment to Dave
- This issue was created (and commented) before we started using validation constraints on Entity API level. Using 2 different validation systems with no common settings can give unexpected or even invalid output.
IMO this issue needs to be closed (won't fix).
I came across this issue as it's blocking validation issues (like #2004136: Input validation is missing).
Comment #11
yoroy commentedThanks for looking at this. I don't know what to review here, so scaling back to just "usability" for now.
Comment #15
realityloop commented