Closed (fixed)
Project:
Omega
Version:
7.x-4.x-dev
Component:
Documentation
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
7 May 2013 at 21:24 UTC
Updated:
13 Apr 2014 at 19:57 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
fubhy commentedYes, you CAN use it with Sassy.
However, that should be your fallback/last resort solution if you REALLY can't use Ruby (or, even better, RVM [Ruby Version Manager]) together with Bundler, etc. to fully leverage all the awesome things that come with it.
If you can use native Ruby, use it.
Comment #3
Ares_ekb commentedI can't get it working. I'm using Sassy with https://github.com/richthegeek/phpsass
It's seems that it couldn't find a 960gs extension:
SassContextException: Undefined Mixin: container: /home/u10098/domains/u10098.krypton.vps-private.net/sites/all/themes/onfit/sass/partials/utility/abstractions/_grid.scss::15 Source: %container в функции SassContext->getMixin() (строка 101 в файле /home/u10098/domains/u10098.krypton.vps-private.net/sites/all/libraries/phpsass/tree/SassContext.php).
Comment #4
fubhy commentedOur default Sass structure is probably not supported by Sassy. Again, Sassy is NOT a good choice. If you want to have a sane way of doing Sass use Ruby. Anything else is never going to be as well supported as the native Ruby Sass compiler and I am not going to provide support for how to use Omega 4.x with Susy, sorry! :/
Comment #5
Marko B commentedI am not saying to use Sassy but I really had so much trouble with Ruby and setting everything on my machine and I see many others also had that painful experience. So as PHP dev. to me it seems much more appealing to have PHP processing of Sass to Css, as it is just one text to other text processing, doesn't look like something only Ruby can do. Most of the people are looking only for compiling and guarding of files (auto compiling) if I am not mistaking, guessing Sassy could do that properly? Hope somebody did manage to do that and will post how-to online.
Comment #6
Marko B commentedJust a question for fubhy. Why is RVM better then plain http://rubyinstaller.org/ (yes using win 7 at the moment)? I also installed ruby dev kit as it seemed also needed.