OK how about this one?

Task title
Evaluate all 5.x WYSIWG, WYSIWM, rich text etc. editors

Task description
Drupal.org has over 100 modules in the "filters and editors" category. Quite a number of these are editors which modify textareas for easy formatting of posts.

Drupal core does not currently have an editor, and this is often a feature request in the forums. Dries has mentioned that an editor in core would be considered for Drupal 7, but in general the community has been unable to find one which is up to scratch, and many users end up trying several different editors before they find one which works for their site.

You should take the following steps to complete the task:

Find all editors from http://drupal.org/project/Modules/category/63

Install each editor in a Drupal 5 installation and evaluate it for the following points:

1. Does it have an offical 5.x release?
2. Does it pass coder.module testing?
3. Does it have up-to-date/useful documentation
4. Did you find any bugs?
5. Does it generate valid XHTML

If you find any issues, submit a bug report to the module's issue queue if one does not already exist.

You should also make notes (and ratings if appropriate) for the following criteria:
Ease of installation, settings etc.. Does it require third-party libraries? Does it depend on another drupal module?
Editor usability.
Any functionality you think the module is missing.

These should be presented in a table/chart in a post on the wysiwyg group.

In addition, pick three modules you particularly liked, and write up a longer description of their features, why you liked them, and include screenshots of the editing interface - this should be a separate post in the wysiwyg group.

http://groups.drupal.org/wysiwyg
http://drupal.org/project/Modules/category/63
http://groups.drupal.org/node/7048 (Themes review).

Comments

catch’s picture

Title: Evaluate all 5.x and 6.x WYSIWG, WYSIWM etc. editors » Proposal: Evaluate all 5.x and 6.x WYSIWG, WYSIWM etc. editors
catch’s picture

Status: Active » Needs review
aclight’s picture

Title: Proposal: Evaluate all 5.x and 6.x WYSIWG, WYSIWM etc. editors » Proposal: Evaluate all 5.x and 6.x WYSIWYG, WYSIWYM etc. editors
Status: Needs review » Needs work

Overall I think this is a pretty good idea, especially since I've gone down this road before.

However, I do have a few concerns:

1. This could be a really big task, depending on how many of the projects in this category are editors.
2. Determining if a module has "up to date/useful documentation" can be difficult to determine, since useful is subjective and it might be hard to know if it's up to date without really examining the feature set of the module to see if the documentation matches.
3. Maybe the results of this task should also be turned into a documentation page? That would give them more visibility.

catch’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review

1. I count betwen 10-15 so this ought to be manageable.
2. Yep - and this is covered in ease of installation etc. anyway
3. Definitely yes. I'd thought of that but wasn't sure where they should go.

Here's some minor edits:

Task title
Evaluate all 5.x WYSIWG, WYSIWM, rich text etc. editors

Task description
Drupal.org has over 100 modules in the "filters and editors" category. Around a dozen of these are editors which modify textareas for easy formatting of posts.

Drupal core does not currently have an editor, and this is often a feature request in the forums. Dries has mentioned that an editor in core would be considered for Drupal 7, but in general the community has been unable to find one which is up to scratch, and many users end up trying several different editors before they find one which works for their site.

You should take the following steps:

Find all editors from http://drupal.org/project/Modules/category/63

Install each editor in a Drupal 5 installation and evaluate it for the following points:

1. Does it have an offical 5.x release?
2. Does it pass coder.module testing?
3. Did you find any bugs?
4. Does it generate valid XHTML

If you find any issues, submit a bug report to the module's issue queue if one does not already exist.

You should also make notes (and ratings if appropriate) for the following criteria:
Ease of installation, settings etc.. Does it require third-party libraries? Does it depend on another drupal module?
Editor usability.
Any functionality you think the module is missing.

These should be presented in a table/chart in a post on the wysiwyg group.

In addition, pick three modules you particularly liked, and write up a longer description of their features, why you liked them, and include screenshots of the editing interface - this should be a separate post in the wysiwyg group.

Once your findings have been reviewed, you should also add them as a Handbook page to complete the task.

http://groups.drupal.org/wysiwyg
http://drupal.org/project/Modules/category/63
http://groups.drupal.org/node/7048 (Themes review).

aclight’s picture

+1 from me

Two minor points:
1. A link to coder.module either in the description or the references would be helpful.
2. The students might not know who Dries is. Maybe just go with "There is a possibility that an editor may be included in core for Drupal 7..."

catch’s picture

Made those changes. I'm happy to help with reviews for this dependent on timing, but I've only ever used quicktags (and tinymce a long time ago which I hated), so I'm not sure if that's useful or not for this.

Also if this goes well, I'm sure there's potential variations for other groups of modules (voting, ecommerce, taxonomy, menus etc.)

Anyway here it is, I won't have time to submit as an actual task until a bit later, but should be ready with a bit of luck:

Task title
Evaluate all 5.x WYSIWG, WYSIWM, rich text etc. editors

Task description
Drupal.org has over 100 modules in the "filters and editors" category. Around a dozen of these are editors which modify textareas for easy formatting of posts.

Drupal core does not currently have an editor, and this is often a feature request in the forums, however there's a possibility that one would be considered for core in Drupal 7. In general the community has been unable to find one which is up to scratch, and many users end up trying several different editors before they find one which works for their site.

You should take the following steps for this task:

Find all editors from http://drupal.org/project/Modules/category/63

Install each editor in a Drupal 5 installation* and evaluate it for the following points:

1. Does it have an offical 5.x release?
2. Does it pass coder.module testing?
3. Did you find any bugs?
4. Does it generate valid XHTML

If you find any issues, submit a bug report to the module's issue queue if one does not already exist.

You should also make notes (and ratings if appropriate) for the following criteria:
Ease of installation, settings etc.. Does it require third-party libraries? Does it depend on another drupal module?
Editor usability.
Any functionality you think the module is missing.

These should be presented in a table/chart in a post on the wysiwyg group.

In addition, pick three modules you particularly liked, and write up a longer description of their features, why you liked them, and include screenshots of the editing interface - this should be a separate post in the wysiwyg group.

Once your findings have been reviewed, you should also add them as a Handbook page to complete the task.

Resources
http://groups.drupal.org/wysiwyg
http://drupal.org/project/Modules/category/63
http://groups.drupal.org/node/7048 (Themes review).
http://drupal.org/project/coder

* You will need to enable and disable each module as you evaluate them to avoid conflicts.

webchick’s picture

Great task. Once aclight says this is ready, go ahead and taskify it @ code.google.com

aclight’s picture

Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community

looks good to me.

webchick’s picture

Great! catch, could you create a Drupal issue for this (i guess in the Documentation queue) and post the task over here: http://code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-drupal/issues/... ?

catch’s picture

Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Fixed

Done! hope it's alright.

webchick’s picture

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Looks good. Closing this, since the task has been proposed so it doesn't confuse people in searches.