Thank you for your work!
This might turn into a feature request or might be better solved outside the module.
Here is the configuration I've got:
(Menu is the same as taxonomy)
References
-View Reference Product 1
-View Reference Product 2
...

The Views are available through menu and from the Views you get to a node level showing the references.

Now I know that the Views pages are a seperate thing but on the Nodes Pages I get a breadcrump trail like this
Home > References > Product 1
Thing is "References" has no own View/Node asigned to it and therefore shouldn't be displayed.
How could I do this? Would it be possible to implement an option to write '' or somthing like that in the taxonomy Breadcrumb path so the term doesn't show up in the BC?

Comments

_craig’s picture

_craig commented
Category: support » feature
Status: Active » Postponed

Not a current feature...
No promises but I'll keep it in mind for the future.

s.daniel’s picture

s.daniel commented

Thanks for the reply I'll keep an eye on the new releases :)

MGN’s picture

MGN commented
Status: Postponed » Closed (fixed)

Closing because this an old issue and with D7 on the horizon, I am less inclined to work on features requests for D5. I think this might be possible in the current D6 version.

tyler-durden’s picture

tyler-durden commented
Status: Closed (fixed) » Active

I'm reopening this to if only correctly put it in "closed (Won't Fix)" rather than closed and fixed, as I do not see this in the module. My issue is similar, and I think a resolution to this would solve a few others issues people are having with multipple taxonomy's and trying to have some not show as breadcrumbs.

Would it be easy enough to hack the current version to not display the breadcrumb if you set the "Weight" of the term to "-99" or some other number? A check box would be better to have it not show, but more work. If someone was interested in spending a small amount of time tweaking this in, I'd be willing to paypal a few dollars to them. Thanks!

tyler-durden’s picture

tyler-durden commented

I was in a rush to post the above message as the coffee shop was closing. I am currently testing this with Hierarchical taxonomy, and I thought I should share the details of my dilemma. Maybe someone has a better work around for this. I am using cars for an example, and I do not want the year to be a taxonomy linked term.

Cars-> Ford -> Mustang -> 1969
In the case above, "1969" would be the last linked taxonomy term on the node, but it really should be "Mustang".

Cars-> Ford -> Mustang -> 1969 -> Mach 1
In the above example, I really want to get certain trim and models into the taxonomy, but again I want the deepest taxonomy to show is "Mustang". I would really like the feature to not show certain taxonomy terms, how many hours of work would this involve??

jantoine’s picture

jantoine commented
Status: Active » Closed (won't fix)

Closing as the 5.x branch is no longer supported. I do believe this is fixed in the 7.x branch.