user_access() function returns a string not a boolean.
This caused memory consumption problems for us due to a bug elsewhere in our code.
i.e.

return strstr($perm[$account->uid], "$string, ");

should probably be

if ( strstr($perm[$account->uid], "$string, ")) 
{
   return true;
} else 
{
   return false;
}
Support from Acquia helps fund testing for Drupal Acquia logo

Comments

deekayen’s picture

Attached patch has a spelling correction and makes user_access() return only booleans. Diff'ed against HEAD.

deekayen’s picture

It bothered me to have a string search instead of an array search for permissions. This patch does what the previous patch does, but it uses in_array() on the static $perm instead of strstr() on a string.

deekayen’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » deekayen
killes@www.drop.org’s picture

Assigned: deekayen » Unassigned

Can you please provide a benchmark test of the strstr approach vs the in_array one? I am concerned that it might be slower. user_access gets called quite often.

deekayen’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » deekayen

That's a fair request. The output of the following code on my WinXP, PHP5.1-dev, 2.133 Ghz Athlon is:

0.29749894142151
0.29712684249878
1.0804200172424
0.56814384460449
0.10924220085144
0.12113380432129
0.13284420967102

<?php

function utime($a = '')
{
  static $utime;

  $time  = explode(' ',  microtime());
  $usec  = (double)$time[0];
  $sec   = (double)$time[1];
  switch($a) {
    case 'bm':
      $to_return = $usec + $sec - $utime;
      break;
    default:
      $utime = $usec + $sec;
      return $utime;
      break;
  }
  $utime = $usec + $sec;
  return $to_return;
}

$account->uid = 1;

utime();

for($i=0; $i<500000; $i+=1) {
  if ($account->uid == 1) {
    // blah
  }
}

echo utime('bm') .'<br />';

for($i=0; $i<500000; $i+=1) {
  if ((int)$account->uid === 1) {
    // blah
  }
}

echo utime('bm') .'<br />';

for($i=0; $i<50; $i+=1) {
  $result[$i] = '';
  for($j=0; $j>10; $j+=1) {
    $result[$i] .= chr(rand(65-126));
  }
}

$perm[$account->uid] = '';

utime();

for($i=0; $i<2000; $i+=1) {
  foreach($result as $row) {
    $perm[$account->uid] .= "$row, ";
  }

  isset($perm[$account->uid]) && strstr($perm[$account->uid], "{$result['45']}, ");
}

echo utime('bm') .'<br />';

$perm[$account->uid] = array();

utime();

for($i=0; $i<2000; $i+=1) {
  foreach($result as $row) {
    $perm[$account->uid][] = $row;
  }

  isset($perm[$account->uid]) && in_array($result['45'], $perm[$account->uid]);
}

echo utime('bm') .'<br />';

for($i=0; $i<500000; $i+=1) {
  // blah
}

echo utime('bm') .'<br />';

for($i=0; $i<500000; $i++) {
  // blah
}

echo utime('bm') .'<br />';

for($i=0; $i<500000; $i = $i+1) {
  // blah
}

echo utime('bm') .'<br />';

?>
deekayen’s picture

Actually, there's a bug in the benchmark code that causes $result to not populate. Switch the following:

  for($j=0; $j>10; $j+=1) {

to

  for($j=0; $j<10; $j+=1) {

Then the string search is more like 8.1727991104126 seconds verses like 0.46953892707825 for the array search, an even bigger difference.

Dries’s picture

Committed to HEAD.

killes@www.drop.org’s picture

Version: 4.6.0 »

Please revert this patch, it isn't working at all. Drupal HEad is non-workign for all users which aren't No. 1.

moshe weitzman’s picture

yeah - this breaks HEAD completely. here is a possible fix, if we still want to use in_array() for checking. this is in user_access() where we build the permission array:

while ($row = db_fetch_object($result)) {
      foreach (explode(',', $row->perm) as $p) {
        $perm[$account->uid][] = trim($p);
      }
}
deekayen’s picture

I haven't found a case where trim() would be necessary if you explode on ', ' (with the space). I made a patch so things are hopefully less broken. I'm working on the benchmark people keep asking me for in #drupal.

deekayen’s picture

in_array() was faster, but explode() is slow, so this reverts back to strstr. I hope I can blame my newbieness to Drupal internals on this, but I should have looked to see how permissions were stored before just assuming each loop through db_fetch_object was a separate permission instead of a string of permissions.

moshe weitzman’s picture

and the fact that you obviously did not test your patch with any user beside uid=1. considering that the code branch you changed doesn't even apply to uid=1, i'd say that this was pretty reckless.

other than that, welcome to the project. we look forward to your future patches ...

killes@www.drop.org’s picture

Status: Needs review » Fixed

the original issue was fixed in core.

Anonymous’s picture

Anonymous’s picture

Anonymous’s picture

Anonymous’s picture

Anonymous’s picture

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)