Postponed
Project:
SOAP Server
Version:
6.x-1.2-beta1
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Reporter:
Created:
5 Feb 2008 at 06:32 UTC
Updated:
16 Nov 2010 at 11:58 UTC
Implement the PHP Soap Extension with additional code from this patch.
Comments
Comment #1
ilo commentedI've tried to get the PHP soap extension working, but seems to be more than I can handle for now with the current services configuration.
I can do some extra code to get an automatic wsdl generation (php soap extension does not do this) on server construction (http://us.php.net/manual/en/function.soap-soapserver-construct.php) , but I can't bypass the services naming convention used up to now (http://us.php.net/manual/en/function.soap-soapserver-addfunction.php) SoapServer:addFunction requires a valid php function, and services do not comply with this (node.load, etc.. )
So it's going to be postponed to a future work since we still don't have the nusoap working neither. I'll focus no nusoap for now, just because it's easy and quick while I find a solution for the php soap extension.
Comment #2
Uhu commentedHi
I´ve got my own SOAP-Server Module working with the native PHP5 extension.
It doesn´t generate WSDL Files yet but I´m working on...
May be it´s interessting to dev with others...
Greets
Uhu
Comment #3
manuel garcia commentedI have been reading online that nusoap has conflicts with the native php5 extension, and there's even a nusoap for php5 on google code.
So I think this feature would be very important to have... any news on this?
Comment #4
manuel garcia commentedNevermind I've seen that this problem is already accounted for in the module, so ignore my previous concern about conflicts with the native php5 extension... (sorry!)
Comment #5
garphyilo @ #1, I agree with you that the naming convention should be changed (at least on the SOAP part). I try to access those methods from a Spring Framework-based Java Application. As usual, I set up a dynamic AOP proxy and a Service Interface but it's not possible to handle those methods with a dot in it...
Comment #6
fuzzy76 commentedAny progress on this?