Closed (fixed)
Project:
Node Auto Term [NAT]
Version:
7.x-1.0-alpha1
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Reporter:
Created:
5 Feb 2008 at 10:22 UTC
Updated:
20 Mar 2010 at 16:00 UTC
I've patched NAT many times for different clients for different reasons. Recently, I needed all the functions for a single website. So, I've combined the features into HEAD and made a patch.
I've marked this patch as needs work - since my testing has not been exhaustive, the code probably does not adhere to Drupal's standards, and I think I missed some t() functions. And, yes I know patches should break out individual functionalities. But, I also know that I never follow through when I plan to make individual patches *sometime* soon.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| new_nat_features.patch | 16.04 KB | jpsalter |
Comments
Comment #1
jpsalter commentedI've used this patch for a while and it hasn't caused me any errors. I think it is ready for testing.
Comment #2
anantagati commentedSubscribing.
Comment #3
loze commentedIs anyone planning on adding this to an official release?
Comment #4
Zen commentedI'd like to review this as separate patches.
Comment #5
jpsalter commentedThanks for the bump. If you're interested in the patches - I'll break them out and update them. Should I work against 5.x-3.1 or 6x.-dev?
Comment #6
Zen commentedAgainst 6 please - Cheers :)
Re: Term -> Node sync - please separate the "bonus" feature into a separate patch as I'm trying to minimise "feature creep" as much as possible.
Thanks a bunch,
-K
Comment #7
ccshannon commentedDoes "Sync terms -> nodes + Bonus: term depth can determine nodetype" mean that one can assign more than one content type to a single vocabulary, based on the hierarchical level? So , content type A syncs to Vocabulary A top level terms, content type B syncs to Vocabulary A mid level terms, and content type C syncs to bottom level terms?
Thanks for all the great work.
Comment #8
ccshannon commentedOops, ignore my comment, thanks. Just discovered I can already do exactly that: three-level vocabulary, each level represented by a separate content type using NAT. Works fantastically!
Got it confused with "one node can only create one term" and reversed it thinking "one vocab can only be represented by one node type" but it's working well.
I think you're talking TAN functionality where the term can be used to determine the matching node type by its place in the vocabulary hierarchy, which is also very cool. Cheers and happy hunting.
Comment #9
derjochenmeyer commentedDoes the patch still apply to current HEAD?
Comment #10
giorgio79 commentedHow about deleting term on node delete? :)
Comment #11
anantagati commentedClosing issue as there is long time no progress. If somebody has interest about those features, please post each feature as separate issue, so it is easy to manage and work on it.