The module is working great for me. The only slight usability issue I have is views with exposed filters.

When the user clicks on the printer-friendly link, the view just like it's wanted. However, on this page, the filters are still changeable, which is fine, but instead of submitting to the printer-friendly version of the view like you would assume, the filter submits to the standard version and the user has to click on the printer-friendly link again.

Not a real bug, just more of a usability issue, than anything.

Bom trabalho João

Comments

jcnventura’s picture

jcnventura
Primary language English
commented
Status: Active » Postponed

For this module, the views filters are just some more links like any others.. The views filters will work when/if I ever manage to make a site fully navigable inside the printer-friendly version (a de facto mobile version :) ).

Until then, I keep this in the 'postponed' limbo.

Obrigado,

João

attheshow’s picture

attheshow commented

Subscribing. I've also got exposed views filters printing in my PDFs and would like to keep those from displaying somehow.

_grizly’s picture

_grizly commented

Simply supply a custom css file to /admin/settings/print/common that filters them out, I use:

.view-filters { display: none; visibility: hidden; }

to remove them all in one hit. ;-)

rnj786’s picture

rnj786 commented

Also if you guys have the views with pager working under print option ? I have views with multiple pages and every time i click the print on say 2nd or 3rd page it takes me to the print version of page 1 and all the links listed on the print version are linked to non
printable version i.e the original site.

I think the issue is to change all the URL's to be relative ( I guess which they are already relative and if they are then adding some base URL which remains there through the life cycle of printer version).

jcnventura’s picture

jcnventura
Primary language English
commented
Status: Postponed » Fixed

See the solution at #1100550: Hide views exposed filters

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

Pentacor’s picture

Pentacor commented
Status: Closed (fixed) » Active
Pentacor’s picture

Pentacor commented
Category: feature » bug

The url is still not being captured correctly. My exposed filters are a date from and to pair of inputs that capture nodes between a pair of dates. When trying to email the data the filters aren't being properly saved (see below)

What is captured by the module:
?field_date_value%5Bmin%5D%5Bdate%5D=2012-03-15&1[field_date_value%5Bmax%5D%5Bdate%5D]=2012-03-23

What should be captured by the module:
?field_date_value%5Bmin%5D%5Bdate%5D=2012-03-15&field_date_value%5Bmax%5D%5Bdate%5D=2012-03-23

Any ideas? Thanks for your help

jcnventura’s picture

jcnventura
Primary language English
commented
Status: Active » Closed (fixed)

Closing this issue as it's necroposting and cross-posting. This is being followed in #1322222: Problem with URL parameters in D7