I just spoke to aclight about this in irc. Posting up here for discussion.

I think "Recommended for 5.x" goes a bit far on the modules and themes listings. It makes sense in update status and individual project pages. But not at all on the teasers. This is mainly because it means "Recommended for 5.x [by the module maintainer]", whereas I imagine a lot of d.o. users will think it's "Recommended by 5.x [by the Drupal development team] [the 5.x maintainer] [the Drupal Association] [something else wrongheaded]" - you know it's going to happen.

I don't have many ideas for better wording (and http://drupal.org/node/230793 might help). "5.x recommended version" came to mind, since it doesn't have the implicit [by someone] in it.

Not a big deal, but fwiw.

Comments

bertboerland’s picture

bertboerland commented

agreed. mnor but good catch. shall we change this?

catch’s picture

catch
he/him
Primary language English
commented

I think "5.x recommended version" would actually be alright. It also implies that there's /different/ versions for 5.x - which let's face it some people won't realise.

silverwing’s picture

silverwing commented
Status: Active » Closed (won't fix)

Queue Cleanup

Currently (December 23, 2009) the teasers have been modified and the release tables have also been changed, so I don't believe this applies now.

Marking as Wont Fix.