In my test system I have enabled all submodules (excluding Blog Subs and Taxonomy Subs).
For testing purposes I have also enabled subscriptions for all Content Types
In my user subscriptions page, the Type/Number table has only one row,
i.e.: subscriptions to all content types are consolidated in one row (Type Threads, Number 8).
Is this a problem with my setup, a work-in-progress condition, or is it the expected behaviour?
Comments
Comment #1
salvisPlease post paths, screenshots, copy&paste text.
Comment #2
salvisDid you give all permissions (assuming that's what you want)?
Comment #3
skizzo commentedI am attaching screenshots for user 1, to rule out permission problems.
In 001.jpg I see that Admin subscribed to 2 different content types (Forum topic and FAQ)
In 002.jpg under I see only one row (Type Threads) consolidating both Forum topic and FAQ.
I was expecting two rows (one for Forum topics and one for FAQ), but maybe my expectation is wrong.
Comment #4
salvisNo, you're subscribe to a thread (really a post) of the type Forum topic and one of the type FAQ. You're not subscribed to any content types (click on "Content types" to verify).
You wrote you had subscriptions_taxonomy and subscriptions_blog enabled, too. Then you should have additional subpages for those two. What you're expecting to see on 002.jpg would be on the "Content types" page, if you had actually subscribed to the content types.
Something is wrong with your installation, but I don't know what it is. This is a problem we haven't seen before, i.e. you're pretty much on your own to find out what it is (sorry!), but I'm very interested to know...
I'm posting some screenshots of one of my test systems, so you can see what you should expect.
Comment #5
skizzo commentedgot it. Your screenshots are explanatory: you may want to include them in the project page, for the benefit of new module users, like me. No problem with taxonomy and blogs either: I said that "I have enabled all submodules (excluding Blog Subs and Taxonomy Subs)". Thank you.
Comment #6
salvisOk, sorry that I mis-read your post. Feel free to post again, of course... :-)