The release notes say that 1.0 was released because 0.9 is missing files.

A release that is an "oops" fix over a prior release generally should not cause the major version number to increase. Did you mean to make this version 0.10 instead of 1.0?

Comments

nedjo’s picture

nedjo
he/him/his
Primary language English
commented

Good question. I did up it to 1.x intentionally, though whether this is appropriate is potentially doubtful. I originally used the 0.x approach when I guess I should really have been issuing betas. (I wasn't used to the new release system--I'm still not using it fully.) I meant at the time to up it to 1.x when it was basically feature complete for the 5.x version.

aren cambre’s picture

aren cambre commented

OK, that's fine. Just wanted to alert you in case it was a mistake. It's OK to close this out if you want.

Your module is great.

aren cambre’s picture

aren cambre commented
Status: Active » Closed (won't fix)